When Your Compliance Plan Hits a Sour Note
David M. Glaser, Esq.
January 15, 2026
Monitor Mondays listeners know that I end each segment with a song. Normally the topic drives the song, but to start the new year, the
There is no way to sugarcoat the difficulty of drainage procedures. That is why expert guidance is paramount when facing these scenarios. When it comes to drainage biopsy procedures, fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy and core biopsy are essential components. An FNA biopsy uses a thin needle to aspirate cells for cytologic evaluation, whereas a core biopsy removes a larger tissue sample with a wider needle for histologic examination. Proper coding of biopsy procedures requires attention to specific guidelines, including when multiple biopsy codes can be assigned and how imaging guidance impacts coding. The following are questions and answers compiled and reviewed by our nationally renowned subject matter experts providing insight into common challenges experienced by coders across the country.
What is a fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy and how is this different from a core biopsy?
FNA biopsy is when material (cells) are aspirated from an area of interest with a needle and the aspirate is sent to the lab for cytologic evaluation. This is different from a core biopsy where core of tissue is being obtained, A core biopsy is most often performed with a larger bore needle to gather a larger (core) amount of tissue which is then sent to the lab for histologic evaluation. Look for aspiration vs. core or needle biopsy, and whether the material obtained is sent to cytology or histology.
Is it ever possible to assign two primary FNA biopsy codes at the same session?
Yes. When two separate lesions are sampled using two different types of modality- specific guidance, each lesion is assigned the modality-specific primary code. Any additional lesions studied using the same type of guidance would be described with the modality-specific add-on code.
Can you code both an FNA biopsy and a core biopsy performed at the same session, on the same lesion, using the same type of imaging guidance?
Per CPT®, assign the modality-specific FNA biopsy code and the organ specific core biopsy code, but do not also assign the separate modality-specific imaging guidance code that was used for the core biopsy.
Be aware that this differs from current NCCI narrative guidance, which states that only one code, the FNA code or the core biopsy code. Check with your payers to determine which is the correct way to code in these situations.
How do you determine when to code a breast cyst aspiration or an FNA biopsy of the breast?
The appropriate FNA code would be assigned when the intent of the procedure was to obtain a sample of cells or fluid for diagnostic evaluation, even if the lesion collapses and turns out to be a cyst. Code 19000 would be assigned if the intent was to drain a cyst, even if the aspirated material is sent to the lab for cytologic evaluation.
How do you determine whether a bone biopsy would be considered superficial (20220) or deep (20225)?
The long descriptions for codes 20220 and 20225 include examples of what would normally fit in the superficial (i.e., ilium, sternum, spinous process, ribs) or deep (i.e., vertebral body, femur) category. The bones listed are not exclusive, if a bone biopsy is performed in another area a good test might be whether the bone can be felt or if it must be found by guidance. When unsure, ask the physician whether they would consider it superficial or deep.
What is the difference between codes 55700 and 55706? They both describe needle biopsy of the prostate; how do you determine which to use?
Both codes do describe needle biopsy of the prostate, but the procedures they are describing are very different. Code 55700 is the standard prostate biopsy which is performed transrectally under ultrasound guidance and local anesthetic with 6 to 12 passes through a lesion in the prostate for sampling – this is the biopsy that is most likely to be performed by an interventional radiologist.
Code 55706 requires general anesthesia and the use of a biopsy grid to sample the entire prostate with up to 60 transperineal samples.
If an injection and an aspiration are performed on the same joint at the same session, is it appropriate to code for both? No, the descriptions for codes 20600-20611 say “aspiration and/or injection,” so it would not be appropriate to assign a code twice if both are performed inthe same joint at the same session.
Your 2025 Coding Remains at Risk: These Are NOT All the Tips and Tricks Necessary for IR Success. With every dollar of reimbursement counting more than ever in the face of payment decline and complex changes, it’s imperative to make sure your CPT® coding is correct and compliant. Master more IR drainage coding topics and break down the complexity with our 2025 Catheter-Based Drainage Interventional Radiology Coding Webcast.
Monitor Mondays listeners know that I end each segment with a song. Normally the topic drives the song, but to start the new year, the
EDITOR’S NOTE: The author of this article used AI-assisted tools in its composition, but all content, analysis, and conclusions were based on the author’s professional
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
