Decoding Cancelled Surgery – When, Why, and What

Decoding Cancelled Surgery – When, Why, and What

I was recently presented with a case and asked about the proper way to handle it, and I thought it would be a good matter to cover here.

I have written about surgery in the past, but it is always worth another look, since such cases will show up in every hospital at some point.

This patient was an elderly female with a litany of the usual medical issues, including diabetes, chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, and atrial fibrillation. The planned procedure was placement of a left atrial occlusion device, the Watchman.

Of course, many of you could likely predict that my first question was “who is the insurer?” And as I think about it, in the past, we often presented cases by noting the patient’s race, such as “this 47-year-old black female.” But with the increasing realization that race-based decisions in healthcare have no data to support them, perhaps we should adjust to presenting cases by instead noting the payor, such as “this 67-year-old female, covered by a Blue Cross Medicare Advantage plan, presents with…” since their insurer can influence what care can be provided and who can provide it.  

In this case, the patient had traditional Medicare. So, the procedure was scheduled as inpatient, since the procedure was on the Medicare Inpatient-Only List (IPO). She arrived at the hospital and signed her Important Message from Medicare (IMM) and the myriad of other papers that we present to patients that no one ever reads. She was prepped for her procedure, taken to the procedure room, and anesthesia started. The transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probe was inserted, and it was noted that the dimensions of the left atrial appendage were such that the Watchman could not be used. The procedure was terminated, and the patient was awakened and discharged soon thereafter.

How do we handle this? We must look at two aspects of the case: admission status and billable services.

Should this visit be billed as an inpatient admission? That’s a reasonable question. This patient was appropriately scheduled as an inpatient, and on arrival she was formally admitted as an inpatient. But with every cancelled inpatient procedure, we need to ask: since it was cancelled, should the reason for the cancellation have been found before the patient even arrived? In this case, was a prior TEE done, with assessment of the size of the left atrial appendage? If so, how long ago? Should one have been done more recently to ensure that the patient was a Watchman candidate?

If there was a lapse here, you should not bill inpatient, but instead either do a quick Condition Code 44 change to outpatient – or self-deny and rebill to Part B. This would also be the proper action if in the pre-op area the patient reported a sore throat or fever, or a lab test was performed that was abnormal.

In fact, some hospitals have adopted a policy that an elective inpatient surgery patient is not considered formally admitted as an inpatient until the patient arrives in the operating room. This simplifies the situation wherein a condition found in pre-op leads to cancellation. Since the patient has not yet been formally admitted, the services provided in pre-op can be billed as outpatient services, avoiding the need for a Condition Code 44 change or self-denial and rebill. 

If the cancellation occurred after the procedure was commenced, and was truly unavoidable, such as the patient developing an arrythmia after anesthesia was induced or the patient developing unrelenting hypotension when the femoral catheter was placed, then it is appropriate to bill the inpatient admission.

Now that you know what admission status to bill, what services can go on the claim, be it an inpatient claim or an outpatient claim? Well, it should not have to be said that you cannot bill for the placement of the Watchman device with the appropriate ICD-10-PCS code, since the placement was not even started. If your operating room staff opened the Watchman packaging, you better hope that Boston Scientific will give you a refund, because the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) won’t pay you anything for a device that was never used. But the claim can include the codes for what was done: the work in pre-op, anesthesia services, the TEE (if done), the femoral artery catheter placement, and so on.

Then the complex payment rules kick in, be it inpatient or outpatient, and you get paid what you get paid. For an inpatient claim, the principal diagnosis in this case will be atrial fibrillation, and depending on which secondary diagnoses are coded, it will fall into DRGs 308 to 310, which have weights of 0.55 to 1.20. In comparison, if the Watchman was placed, the DRG would be 273 or 274, with weights of 3.24 or 3.90. Interestingly, if the device was attempted to be placed and it was unsuccessful, according to billing instructions from the manufacturer, and my attempts to assign the appropriate DRG based on the ICD-10-PCS codes, that would fall into DRG 228 or 229, which have weights of 3.18 and 5.04.  

For outpatient, the (nearly incomprehensible) Ambulatory Payment Classification (APC) payment rules apply, but the payment would likely be under $1,000, with the TEE paying about $526. In addition, depending on the point of cancellation, there may be modifiers that must be applied to specific services.

In summary, cancelled inpatient surgeries require special attention.

Be sure that the correct status and services are billed. Billing for an inpatient admission when the proper claim would be outpatient can lead to an overpayment with increased scrutiny. Ensuring that the claim uses the appropriate procedure codes, either ICD-10-PCS or HCPCS, is also crucial to ensure that the payment is appropriate.

Programming note:

Listen to Dr. Ronald Hirsch every Monday morning as he makes his rounds on Monitor Mondays, and sponsored by R-1, RCM at 10 Eastern with program host Chuck Buck.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, ACPA-C, CHCQM, CHRI

Ronald Hirsch, MD, is vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at R1 Physician Advisory Services. Dr. Hirsch’s career in medicine includes many clinical leadership roles at healthcare organizations ranging from acute-care hospitals and home health agencies to long-term care facilities and group medical practices. In addition to serving as a medical director of case management and medical necessity reviewer throughout his career, Dr. Hirsch has delivered numerous peer lectures on case management best practices and is a published author on the topic. He is a member of the Credentials Council and Government Affairs Committee of the American College of Physician Advisors, on the advisory board of the National Association of Healthcare Revenue Integrity, a member of the American Case Management Association, and a Fellow of the American College of Physicians. Dr. Hirsch is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is regular panelist on Monitor Mondays. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, policies, or opinions of R1 RCM, Inc. or R1 Physician Advisory Services (R1 PAS).

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering OB GYN Coding Accuracy: Precision Coding for Compliance and Reimbursement

Gain clarity and confidence in OB‑GYN coding with this expert‑led webcast featuring Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS‑P, CPEDC, COPC. You’ll learn how to apply global maternity package rules accurately, select the right CPT codes for procedures and visits, and identify documentation gaps that lead to denials. With practical guidance and real examples, this session helps you strengthen compliance, reduce audit risk, and ensure accurate reimbursement for women’s health services.

May 14, 2026

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update Webcast Series

Uncover essential coding insights with nationally recognized coding authority Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS. Through ICD10monitor’s interactive, on‑demand webcast series, Kay walks you through the AHA’s 2026 ICD‑10‑CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics, translating each update into practical, easy‑to‑apply guidance designed to sharpen precision, ensure compliance, and strengthen day‑to‑day decision‑making. Available shortly after each official release.

April 13, 2026

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update: Fourth Quarter

Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.

December 14, 2026

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update: Third Quarter

Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s third quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.

October 12, 2026

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Compliance for the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility (IPF-PPS): Minimizing Federal Audit Findings by Strengthening Best Practices

Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.

April 9, 2026

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips

Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.

March 19, 2026

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

BLOOM INTO SAVINGS! Get 25% OFF during our spring sale through March 27. Use code SPRING26 at checkout to claim this offer.

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24