Audit and regulatory challenges that were ever-present in years past only seem primed to increase over the new year.
The long-awaited implementation of the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Patient Assessment Instrument (IRF-PAI) 4.0 will occur for all discharges on or after Oct. 1, 2022. In case you missed it, the change was included in the 2022 Home Health Final Rule – an interesting place to address it. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) believes that IRFs now have the resources needed for training, updates, and workflow to complete the updated assessments. Additionally, we believe that this is a strong indication of CMS’s focus on moving forward with data collection to address the social determinants of health (SDoH), as updated quality measurements include several of them.
Next up, in the December MedPAC public meeting, there was a recommendation for a 5-percent reduction in Medicare payment for IRFs in FY 2022. This recommendation is consistent with update reports from earlier in 2021. While we have seen this same recommendation for payment reduction for several consecutive years, there appears to be strong support from several of the commissioners, based on their questions and comments, as noted in the meeting transcript, and this issue certainly bears watching. The Commission did acknowledge increased costs associated with COVID in 2022.
And if payment pushback isn’t enough, we have a pending demonstration project that would require 100-percent review of IRF claims in a certain sample group. The Proposed Review Choice Demonstration for IRFs is still looming, and will have a significant impact. The comment period that ended in October featured extremely strong opposition from both provider and patient advocacy groups, for many reasons, including the impact of the public health emergency (PHE) and patient access to care. If implemented, the demonstration would last five years, beginning with four states – Alabama, Pennsylvania, Texas, and California – and expand to all IRFs located in states covered by Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) jurisdictions JJ, JL, JH, and JE. So, if your MAC is Noridian, Novitas, or Palmetto, you would eventually be involved. Each IRF would choose either 100-percent pre-claim review or 100-percent post-payment review, and would be locked into this method until they meet the 90-percent threshold for affirmation. The review would cover six-month cycles. If the IRF reaches 90-percent affirmation based on a minimum of 10 pre-claim requests or claims submitted, they may opt-out of future reviews, except for a 5-percent spot-check of claims.
And of course, as we’ve already heard, there are ongoing audits. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) continues to review IRF claims, with alarming denial rates mainly due to “medical necessity,” often based on claims for which the IRF did not demonstrate at the time of admission that the patient met the requirements noted in the Medicare Benefits Policy Manual. Targeted Probe-and-Educate (TPE) audits, routine MAC audits, Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) audits, and Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) reviews continue, and the denial reasons are fairly consistent across the reviews. If there is such as term as “appeal fatigue,” I suspect that IRFs are experiencing it.
Finally, IRFs need to continue to evaluate how they support quality patient care and throughput, as we continue through the COVID PHE, including COVID-specific rehab programs and utilization of the available waivers – which we predict, will be extended.
Beyond the regulatory issues, IRFs are also experiencing workforce issues – another challenge in providing quality care.
Your focus for 2022 should include reviewing your processes for the updated IRF-PAI, checking your documentation – particularly the preadmission assessment – to be certain it supports the admission as reasonable and necessary, and be prepared to appeal while continuing to be on the watch for changes.
All things considered, 2022 looks to be a challenging year for all of us, so buckle up, strap on your helmet, and get ready for another wild ride.
I am sure everyone agrees that not only is providing healthcare complicated, but so are all the administrative aspects of healthcare. And as a result,
Let me start this article by asking for your help. Flash back to 2013. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) at that time
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
