Crowdsourcing Health Data: A Resource or Liability?

Worried young woman looking at phone

Is it a worthwhile or reliable means to gather information?

EDITOR’S NOTE: Jason Henninger is the managing editor and product manager at MedLearn Media.

Making trending news recently, the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating reports of food poisoning related to Lucky Charms cereal. General Mills’ own investigation found nothing wrong with the food, but that alone is of course not enough to satisfy the FDA.

A notable aspect of this story is the role crowdsourcing played, via the website iwaspoisoned.com. Around 3,000 people have complained there of stomach issues, and blamed the cereal. The FDA itself received about 100 complaints through its own reporting methods.

While it is beyond the scope of MedLearn to comment on the veracity of these claims or the inner workings of the FDA or General Mills, the situation raises an interesting question about the nature of crowdsourcing. Is it, to put it bluntly, a worthwhile or trustworthy means to gather information? In the pre-Internet days, the idea of gaining reliable intelligence from mass sources would have been viewed for the most part as hearsay at worst, and folk wisdom at best.

The term crowdsourcing comes from the editors of Wired magazine in 2005, who intended it to mean outsourcing a task to a crowd (more along the lines of what we’d now call the gig economy). The idea evolved to mean a sort of voluntary public database. Wikipedia, probably the most widely used crowdsourced website (though it predates the term itself) is an incredible achievement in collaboration, and a great place to begin learning on a vast array of subjects.

But no matter how much accurate material can be found there, Wikipedia should never be considered a definitive source. After all, academic, scientific, and journalistic research all have rigorous standards; crowdsourcing has posting guidelines at most. This is not to say that crowdsourcing isn’t valuable. But it isn’t intrinsically reliable.

The complexity of the concern can affect the reliability of the crowdsourced information. A website called Does the Dog Die? crowdsources warnings about potentially triggering scenes in movies. Since the reporting relates to something easily verifiable, it is a fairly non-controversial website with little to complicate its findings. Compare this to the famous example of Redditors who took it upon themselves to identify the Boston Marathon bomber, which resulted in several innocent people being harassed.

The website in question here, iwaspoisoned.com, requires no sign-in, no input from physicians (though the site employs physicians as advisors). In other words, there’s no proof. After all, it is crowdsourcing, and crowdsourcing doesn’t require proof. But one of the truisms of research is that correlation does not imply causation. Put another way, the plural of anecdote is not evidence. To the website’s credit, they never claim to provide definitive proof of food poisoning outbreaks; they merely provide a platform to report it, and offer alerts. Further, they can and do report their findings to governmental bodies such as the FDA. There is likely value in doing so.

And yet one doesn’t need to think too long to spot some pitfalls here. First and foremost, people without medical training are making what amounts to self-diagnoses. This can be a dangerous practice for ill people, and a misleading practice when made public. Someone could get sick from spaghetti they ate on the weekend but think, wait, I had Lucky Charms for breakfast. That must be it, because all these other people say the same thing.

It will be interesting to follow this story, especially as the FDA investigates the claims. Will iwaspoisoned.com come out looking like a great source of real-time data of a scope the FDA can’t compete with, or a platform for speculation? Either way, it might be a good time to switch less sugary breakfast.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Jason Henninger

Jason Henninger is the managing editor of MedLearn Media. In nearly twenty years as a writer and editor, he has worked for Advance Local, the Los Angeles Times, Macmillan, and World Tribune Press.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

2026 IPPS Masterclass 3: Master MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 3: MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

This third session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review of FY26 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 14, 2025
2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 2: Master ICD-10-PCS Changes

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 2: Master ICD-10-PCS Changes

This second session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review the FY26 changes to ICD-10-PCS codes. This information will be presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 13, 2025
2026 IPPS Masterclass 1: Master ICD-10-CM Changes

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 1: Master ICD-10-CM Changes

This first session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature an in-depth explanation of FY26 changes to ICD-10-CM codes and guidelines, CCs/MCCs, and revisions to the MCE, presented by presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 12, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.

June 19, 2025
Open Door Forum Webcast Series

Open Door Forum Webcast Series

Bring your questions and join the conversation during this open forum series, live every Wednesday at 10 a.m. EST from June 11–July 30. Hosted by Chuck Buck, these fast-paced 30-minute sessions connect you directly with top healthcare experts tackling today’s most urgent compliance and policy issues.

June 11, 2025
Open Door Forum: The Changing Face of Addiction: Coding, Compliance & Care

Open Door Forum: The Changing Face of Addiction: Coding, Compliance & Care

Substance abuse is everywhere. It’s a complicated diagnosis with wide-ranging implications well beyond acute care. The face of addiction continues to change so it’s important to remember not just the addict but the spectrum of extended victims and the other social determinants and legal ramifications. Join John K. Hall, MD, JD, MBA, FCLM, FRCPC, for a critical Q&A on navigating substance abuse in 2025.  Register today and be a part of the conversation!

July 16, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24