Optimal post-acute recovery depends on engagement with patients.
Now more than ever, in the face of COVID -19, the Conditions of Participation for Medicare (CoP) demand that a discharge plan focus on the preferences of the patient or surrogate decision-makers.
There is solid research backing this concept. People who feel that their preferences for post-acute care have been heard are more likely to follow prescribed regimens. There has been so much written about this that I must leave it to each of you to do your own research. My point is that the new Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) mandates are foundationally solid.
Navigating preferences boils down to engagement and knowing our patients.
Through a grant-funded population health management initiative begun three years ago, I and my team got to experiment with patient engagement across the continuum, with the patient-centered goal of effective self-management of chronic health conditions. We discovered that engagement boils down to finding out as much about a patient as we can. The initial assessment explores the resources available to a patient and what barriers there are to optimal recovery: strengths and weaknesses. It is impossible to do this deep dive without finding out what is important to an individual: preferences. This mirrors the interpretative guidance for the 2020 CoP.
What does that look like, in-hospital practice?
Engage the patient/surrogate however you can. Begin the conversation with questions, not statements. What has your doctor told you about why you were admitted? Did he/she say what to expect? How long will you be in the hospital? Did your doctor say anything about what to expect when you are ready for discharge?
Even if the answer is no, that’s still important information: a chance to teach your patient about their rights to get answers to their questions, and encouraging them to do so.
After this, dive into what a patient has going for them and against them: resources and barriers, strengths and weaknesses. Every patient presents with something useful toward the goal of optimal recovery: doing the best possible with what is available. Look at their healthcare encounters over the last six months for clues, prior functional status, caregivers, and support systems. Inform the patient of what a usual course of recovery looks like for someone similarly situated. Then, with their help, develop a strategy toward optimal post-acute recovery, whatever that may look like for them.
Why is this especially important now? Because of COVID-19, we will very soon do more with less than ever thought imaginable.
How easy will it be to get a patient into a skilled nursing facility, should the COVID-19 pandemic reach the dimensions predicted? How hard will it be to get home health care, or to see a primary care provider? What answers will you have for patients and families, when so little is available? What skilled care will they have to shoulder?
We know the answers. We’ve dealt with it before, when, before Medicaid expansion, so many patients were uninsured. You had to dive into the family dynamics, even enlisting the estranged, teaching them how to care for their loved ones, getting them as functionally good enough to move around the house with assistance as possible. You know the drill. It’s the same with a TB patient. Before releasing them to home quarantine, we know all about them, right down to their second cousin, twice removed, if that’s someone with whom they may have contact.
Know as much about your patients as you can, so you can leverage everything available to them. It may not be much, but sometimes good is good enough.
Again, know as much about your patients as you can.
Am I being too optimistic? I hope not. Will we be able to accomplish any of what I’m suggesting? We won’t know unless we try.
The Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation (IMPACT) Act of 2014 has had the effect of bringing us to a realization that optimal post-acute recovery depends on engagement. The patient is not in a position of equal power, but greater power, over their health. We come to the game with superior knowledge. If we get to know our patient as a means to establishing their preferences, the two will find equilibrium. Patient adherence to the prescribed regimen, proven by research, improves, as do concurrent acute-care outcomes. Communication gaps are bridged. In times of extremis, bridging that gap may be the only hope we have, when choices are so limited.
EDITOR’S NOTE Day 3 of the federal shutdown continues. This article by Mark Spivey is part of a special section today published by RACmonitor and
As expected, the federal shutdown began early Wednesday morning. What’s unknown is how long it will continue. Neither congressional Republicans nor Democrats appear to be
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
