CMS Under-Reports Elder Abuse

Recent report from HHH/OIG faults CMS.

A recent study by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS OIG) revealed a concerning series of findings related to the under-reporting of instances of potential abuse and/or neglect of elderly Medicare patients.

Every year, tens of thousands of elderly patients being cared for in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) present in emergency departments seeking treatment related to one of 580 diagnosis codes that were determined by the OIG to correlate with high risk for potential abuse or neglect. The OIG study related to such visits found that despite federal requirements that they are reported, the majority of such visits were, in fact, not. As one might expect, the failure to report in turn disallowed the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and state survey agencies from reporting findings of substantiated abuse occurring in SNFs to local law enforcement, tracking such incidents, or putting in place any form of remediation or corrective action. 

The OIG report went on to identify potential root causes for the dramatic under-reporting, citing a lack of clarity in the CMS reporting requirements as a leading cause. The report also includes a series of recommendations aimed at addressing the severe under-reporting, including training for SNF staff, clarification of reporting requirements and guidelines, and more stringent incident tracking requirements. But there are other potential alternate causes worth considering, including SNF staff’s inability to effectively assess whether an injury might be associated with abuse or neglect, and the possibility that a staff member may be reluctant to speculate about potential abuse (and in doing so, implicate a co-worker). Ultimately, the primary issue is not the failure to report or track incidents, but the unnoticed victimization of elderly patients and the subsequent inability to appropriately care for them.

Patients who present in the emergency department from SNFs (or from home) who appear depressed, confused, and/or agitated may be victims of elder abuse. Even if they are not, they should be evaluated by a psychiatrist in order to yield accurate diagnoses, provide effective treatment recommendations, and assess whether the patient’s condition might be the result of elder abuse.

A psychiatric evaluation would directly contribute to meeting the OIG’s goal of protecting our most vulnerable citizens, ensuring timely and accurate incident reporting, and most importantly, ensuring that these patients receive the care and protection that is their right. Once a more effective and independent assessment and reporting protocol are in place, the data collected on these incidents would enable both CMS and survey agencies to analyze trends and put in place meaningful regulatory measures to prevent future incidents.

Additionally, having an independent physician assess patients and report any suspected abuse or neglect directly to the appropriate authorities would remove the burden on SNF staff to accurately diagnose potential victims of elder abuse, and possibly have to report an incident that might indirectly result in punitive action against a co-worker.

Programming Note:

Listen to Dr. Seward report this story live during Monitor Monday, June 24, 10-10:30 a.m. EST.

Comment on this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Kathy Seward, MD, CHCQM-PHYADV

Kathy Seward, MD, CHCQM-PHYADV is a medical director of coordination of care at a nine-hospital system in southeastern North Carolina. She is also the co-founder of HPIR, LLC, a healthcare consulting company, and the developer of the innovative HPIRounds™ Solution, the best way to manage length of stay. Seward is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

I022426_SQUARE

Fracture Care Coding: Reduce Denials Through Accurate Coding, Sequencing, and Modifier Use

Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.

February 24, 2026
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24