CMS to Accept Hospital Waivers for At-Home Services

At-home services will require daily physician visits.

During a short Thanksgiving work week, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) found time to make two pretty significant announcements. The first is that they are now accepting waiver requests from hospitals to offer true at-home services. In this program, instead of admitting patients requiring hospital care to the hospital, they will be able to send the patient home and provide them hospital-level care in their home. How does CMS define “hospital-level care at home?” Well, there are not many details, but there will need to be three visits per day by medical personnel, with at least one of those visits being by a registered nurse (RN). The other two can be by a nurse or a paramedic, along with a daily doctor visit.

Now, at face value, this makes no sense at all. Patients are put in the hospital because they need to have immediate access to medical personnel, 24 hours a day. We don’t send patients with a transient ischemic attack (TIA) home with a hep lock and a syringe of tPA and tell them to FaceTime the doctor for instructions on how to give themselves an injection if they have another neurologic episode. A chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patient needing frequent nebulizers, at risk of respiratory failure, cannot be sent home with instructions on how to use a leaf blower to do home biPAP if their breathing gets worse. And how does a doctor order a stat X-ray or blood test in a home setting?

The patients who qualify for this program will have to be carefully selected, and probably would be unlikely to pass MCG or InterQual criteria for inpatient admission, even though that is not the standard by which Medicare determines admission appropriateness. A review of a study of a hospital at-home program at a major Boston-area health system, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, showed very strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, including excluding patients over the age of 65 for many diagnoses, and a limit of five patients at one time in the program, along with a five-mile distance limit from the hospital for the patient’s residence.

It also worries me that insurance companies that are already unwilling to approve inpatient admission for anyone but the patient at death’s door will see this program as another excuse to deny more admissions and observation stays, telling hospitals that the patients could have been discharged. And while I assume the payment will be a DRG payment, it is pretty unlikely that any complication or comorbidity (CC) or major CC (MCC) on the claim will be clinically valid, since the patient is at home and not getting added nursing services or experiencing increasing risk.

I will admit that there are many patients who are quite capable of being discharged from the ED and receiving close follow-up at home, but who are hospitalized because of liability fears or convenience factors – and, during a deadly pandemic, with bed shortages, it would be great to allow some beds to remain open. I hope this program works, but unlike many of the other federal waivers, such as using the hospital auditorium as an inpatient ward or setting up a skilled nursing facility (SNF) without walls, this program cannot be started in a day or a week, and maybe not even in a month. It would help if there was adequate revenue in place to support such a program, with the DRG payment structure, but it will only take one bad outcome to make everyone nervous about continuing.

The clear beneficiaries of this waiver will be those hospitals that have existing programs and can now rely less on grants and their commercial patient population, and those facilities that can now quickly shift to add lower-acuity Medicare patients. For others, they may be forced to watch and learn and plan for the future.

Finally, CMS announced two new condition codes, 90 and 91, for use when a patient gets an expanded access or emergency use authorization service, such as these new medications for COVID.

Check out MLN Matters edition MM12049 for details.

Programming Note: Ronald Hirsch, MD is a permanent panelist on Monitor Mondays. Listen to his live reporting every Monday at 10 EST.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, ACPA-C, CHCQM, CHRI

Ronald Hirsch, MD, is vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at R1 Physician Advisory Services. Dr. Hirsch’s career in medicine includes many clinical leadership roles at healthcare organizations ranging from acute-care hospitals and home health agencies to long-term care facilities and group medical practices. In addition to serving as a medical director of case management and medical necessity reviewer throughout his career, Dr. Hirsch has delivered numerous peer lectures on case management best practices and is a published author on the topic. He is a member of the Advisory Board of the American College of Physician Advisors, and the National Association of Healthcare Revenue Integrity, a member of the American Case Management Association, and a Fellow of the American College of Physicians. Dr. Hirsch is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is regular panelist on Monitor Mondays. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, policies, or opinions of R1 RCM, Inc. or R1 Physician Advisory Services (R1 PAS).

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24