Change to the inpatient admission order considered to be major.
Late last week, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the Inpatient Prospective Payment System Final Rule, which becomes effective on Oct. 1. It’s 2,593 pages, so get reading.
I have to commend the CMS staff for their work on this rule. I know few of you actually read these rules, but if you want a taste of what the CMS staff undertakes, read the 64 pages starting on page 487. That is the section in which they evaluate the new CAR-T treatment for leukemia and lymphoma for eligibility for a new technology add-on payment.
Not only do they evaluate the applicable DRG and patient volumes, but also the science behind the treatment, and I’ll admit, they used terminology that I didn’t understand. “Utilize a gene transfer process to modify autologous patient immune cells with a chimeric antigen receptor capable of directing immune mediated killing.”
What does that mean? Well, the CMS staff figured it out, and have awarded new technology status to CAR-T therapy, with an additional $186,000 paid for the treatment. But remember, by law the payment rate is only 50 percent of the cost of a new treatment, so every treatment means a loss of at least $186,000. But you know what the finance people say: we may lose money on every case, but we will make it up on volume.
CMS also added inpatient transfers to hospice to those admissions that will be subject to a reduced DRG payment if their length of stay is less than the geometric mean minus one day. While hospitals may not be happy about this, it is not a frequent occurrence, so it should have little revenue impact. Now, if CMS does this for patients who are admitted as inpatients and subsequently die within a few days, that would be painful. And by the way, this applies to all transfers to hospice, be it inpatient hospice or hospice at home. In the commentary, CMS said that commenters objected to this change because “such payment policies would dissuade transfers to hospice care.” I sure hope that is not true and no one would ever delay discussing hospice because of money.
CMS also finalized its proposal concerning the inpatient admission order. It’s summer, and I did not want to spend my weekend trying to interpret what CMS said, so I can’t provide a detailed analysis, but it is clear that as of Oct. 1, if the inpatient admission order is not authenticated prior to discharge, the claim will not be automatically denied – nor do hospitals have to self-deny if that authentication happened after discharge.
CMS noted that it was never its intent to have the Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs) deny these admissions, nor to have hospitals self-deny them, but unfortunately, both the QIOs and hospitals have spent the last five years thinking that if CMS set it as a condition of payment, there would be no room for leniency.
Now, what are the other implications of their change of heart? I’ll be spending the next two weeks figuring that out for my upcoming webcast on Aug. 16.
In the last six weeks, my colleagues and I have dealt with two situations in which clinics either missed or did not receive the orange
Modern Healthcare reported that UnitedHealthcare (UHC) says that starting Jan. 1, it will only pay for remote patient monitoring for heart failure or hypertensive disorders
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
