CMS incorrectly uses the term “observation.”
As expected, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the 2023 Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) and Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) rules last week. While I have not read them in their entirety yet, it did not take me long to find things to whine about.
The first whine: CMS released two versions of each of the rules. The first came out on Tuesday afternoon, and the next day they released another version. The first one is labeled as “HHS (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) approved, but not yet placed on public display.” What does that mean? How do you post a document for the public to read, yet not put it on public display? Perhaps I can accept that as another one of the many quirks of federal rules and terminology, but then they released the public display versions the next day, and lo and behold, it is in the same format, but the PFS rule is 351 pages shorter and the OPPS rule is 203 pages shorter. What is in those pages that they removed? I am going to be searching for the secrets CMS apparently didn’t want us to read.
The second whine, and it kept me up at night, is that 20 times in the PFS rule, CMS used the words “observation status.” Twenty times! And they use the proper term “observation services” only 19 times. They know that observation is a service provided to outpatients and not a status, and in fact, they have recouped money from providers that billed for observation when doing so was deemed inappropriate. It’s frustrating when the rule-makers use their own terminology incorrectly.
Why is this a big deal? Well, as I described in past episodes of Monitor Mondays about the proposed rule, the new code changes, written by the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT©) committee and adopted by CMS, did absolutely nothing to address the increasing number of patients who are in the hospital as outpatient, but not receiving observation services, such as the patient staying overnight as part of routine recovery after an outpatient surgery.
I whined about it here and I submitted comments to CMS and the American Medical Association (AMA), and it appears their answer is that for such patients, the doctor caring for them should bill their visits with the office visit codes. Now, officially, these codes are called “office and other outpatient visit” codes, but the whole idea of this code simplification was not only to reduce the annoying and dangerous copy-and-pasting, but also to make code selection easier. (This is where Clark Anthony should insert the sound made by a video game when your character dies, because CMS and the AMA failed miserably.)
In addition, in the final rule CMS indicated that when a patient is receiving observation services, the attending can bill the hospital visit codes, but any specialist who sees the patient would have to use office visit codes. That is not simplification.
But just to reassure you, there were no changes to the two-midnight rule, and only minor changes to the inpatient-only list, but also not one word about the continuing unacceptable practices of the Medicare Advantage (MA) plans.
Well, I gave you all a break from my criticism of insurance company policies and ploys last week, and I had planned to go for
A few weeks ago, during the weekly Monitor Monday broadcast, healthcare attorney David Glaser, presented a great segment that simplified the two-midnight rule into two
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.
Optimize your outpatient clinical documentation and gain comprehensive knowledge from foundational practices to advanced technologies, ensuring improved patient care and organizational and financial success. This webcast bundle provides a holistic approach to outpatient CDI, empowering you to implement best practices from the ground up and leverage advanced strategies for superior results. You will gain actionable insights to improve documentation quality, patient care, compliance, and financial outcomes.
Enhancing outpatient clinical documentation is crucial for maintaining accuracy, compliance, and proper reimbursement in today’s complex healthcare environment. This webcast, presented by industry expert Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, will provide you with actionable strategies to tackle complex challenges in outpatient documentation. You’ll learn how to craft detailed clinical narratives, utilize advanced EHR features, and implement accurate risk adjustment and HCC coding. The session also covers essential regulatory updates to keep your documentation practices compliant. Join us to gain the tools you need to improve documentation quality, support better patient care, and ensure financial integrity.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Healthcare organizations face complex regulatory requirements under the No Surprises Act and Price Transparency rules. These policies mandate extensive fee disclosures across settings, and confusion is widespread—many hospitals remain unaware they must post every contracted rate. Non-compliance could lead to costly penalties, financial loss, and legal risks. Join David M. Glaser Esq. as he shows you how to navigate these regulations effectively.
Protect your facility from unwanted audits! Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, and take a deep dive into both the CMS and AMA guidelines for reporting post operative pain blocks. You’ll learn how to determine if the nerve block is separately codable with real life examples for better understanding. Becky will also cover how to evaluate whether documentation supports medical necessity, offer recommendations for stronger documentation practices, and provide guidance on educating providers about documentation requirements. She’ll include a discussion of appropriate modifier and diagnosis coding assignment so that you can be confident that your billing of post operative pain blocks is fully supported and compliant.
During this RACmonitor webcast Dr. Ronald Hirsch spotlights the areas of the OIG’s Work Plan and the findings of their most recent audits that impact utilization review, case management, and audit staff. He also provides his common-sense interpretation of the prevailing regulations related to those target issues. You’ll walk away better equipped with strategies to put in place immediately to reduce your risk of paybacks, increased scrutiny, and criminal penalties.
Copyright © 2024 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
