CMS Dragged Its Feet on MOON, and Hospitals May Pay the Price

EDITOR’S NOTE: This story was written before President Trump ordered an information lockdown on federal agencies, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, from issuing news releases and using social media to communicate to the public. The president’s decision to impose restrictions on information dissemination was made on Monday, Jan. 23.

As of Monday, Jan. 23, we were 44 days away from the date hospitals are required to start giving out the Medicare Outpatient Observation Notice (MOON). And as we heard on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Door Forum call two weeks prior, the agency was planning to release more guidance in “a few weeks” and announce an email address for submitting questions. The CMS subject matter expert who made this announcement then went on to inform listeners that she would not be remaining on the call to take any questions, leaving empty-handed the many people who had called in specifically to hear more details about the MOON.

While Medicare regulations can be complex, especially when dealing with observation and beneficiary rights, it is worth looking at the time frame here. The Notice of Observation Treatment and Implication for Care Eligibility (NOTICE) Act was passed by Congress and signed by President Obama in August 2015. The Act set a deadline of August 2016 for implementation. In December 2015, CMS held a listening session and allowed callers to ask questions and express concerns, but it was solely a one-way conversation. In April 2016, they released the first iteration of the MOON and solicited comments. This version was roundly criticized from all sides for being both too complex and too incomplete.

A new and much-improved version of the MOON was then released as part of the 2017 Inpatient Prospective Payment Rule, with an extensive discussion held on Aug. 2, and it was sent for approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) five days later. Although CMS expected a prompt turnaround, it was not formally approved until four months later, on Dec. 7,and without a single change. That approval started the 90-day grace period for implementation by all inpatient and critical access hospitals.

That means that last August, CMS had a fairly good idea of what the MOON was going to look like and what hospitals would need to know to use it. Yet when approval was obtained, there was no guidance available. They had four months to prepare guidance and did nothing. It was not until Jan. 20, a full 44 days after OMB approval, that CMS finally gave us a few crumbs of information in Transmittal 3695, an addition to Chapter 30 of the Medicare Claims Processing Manual. Yet there is still nowhere to submit questions.

This transmittal did address some of the things hospitals may not do, such as alter the form to accommodate large logos or address bars, and it did provide more information on how to deliver the form to representatives, with very detailed instructions that actually mention two commercial delivery services (FedEx and UPS).

We still don’t know for certain if we are allowed to use checkboxes in the explanation section, even though many are planning to do so. The instructions mandate that “the specific reason” should be noted. Can one get more specific than the fact that the doctor does not have an expectation of over two midnights of care? There also needs to be an oral explanation provided to patients. How detailed does that explanation need to be? We have to document that the oral explanation was given. Where does that have to be documented? What do we do when Medicare Advantage plans tell us after discharge to bill as observation instead of inpatient? Does that beneficiary need a MOON?

To quote Willy Wonka, there is “so much time and so little to do. Wait a minute. Strike that. Reverse it.” On March 8, there will be real consequences for failing to comply; a patient who is upset at not being admitted as inpatient can call and lodge a complaint, and a hospital can then be surveyed and cited. And the surveyors generally look at everything while they are on site, checking under sinks and looking in offices and cabinets. A hospital I recently visited had to get a special Keurig coffeemaker for their case management office because the store-bought Keurigs do not have a grounding plug. Those surveys could happen on March 8; it’s a set-in-stone deadline for hospitals.

Now of course, I could start reminding readers how unleveled the playing field is; has CMS ever felt any consequences for the three-year backlog in appeals when the requirement is 90 days? When the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) reported recently that CMS did not collect millions of taxpayer dollars in overpayments made to Medicare Advantage plans, was CMS penalized? I know; the world is not fair, so I am not going to dwell on this. It is what it is. We just have to do our best.

On Feb. 2 I am going to take everything we know so far and present a RACmonitor webinar. And attendees will get early access to a video that can be used to explain the MOON to patients. There will be an English and a Spanish version. That alone is worth the price of admission. So please consider signing up, and bring your questions.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, ACPA-C, CHCQM, CHRI

Ronald Hirsch, MD, is vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at R1 Physician Advisory Services. Dr. Hirsch’s career in medicine includes many clinical leadership roles at healthcare organizations ranging from acute-care hospitals and home health agencies to long-term care facilities and group medical practices. In addition to serving as a medical director of case management and medical necessity reviewer throughout his career, Dr. Hirsch has delivered numerous peer lectures on case management best practices and is a published author on the topic. He is a member of the Advisory Board of the American College of Physician Advisors, and the National Association of Healthcare Revenue Integrity, a member of the American Case Management Association, and a Fellow of the American College of Physicians. Dr. Hirsch is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is regular panelist on Monitor Mondays. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, policies, or opinions of R1 RCM, Inc. or R1 Physician Advisory Services (R1 PAS).

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

I022426_SQUARE

Fracture Care Coding: Reduce Denials Through Accurate Coding, Sequencing, and Modifier Use

Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.

February 24, 2026
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24