CMS has published a booklet on this procedure.
Recently I was asked to assist with an audit that was to focus on clinical documentation for major joint replacement surgery, specific to the hips and knees.
Of course, I immediately thought about some information and guidance (a booklet) published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in November 2020, though it originated in 2017. With the volume of attention devoted toward the COVID-19 pandemic and the related changes to healthcare policies, procedures, and practices, you might not have gotten into the CMS 2020 guidance (Medicare Learning Network, or MLN) and how it applies to your facility operations and practices – so now is the time (see the link at the end of this article).
Major joint replacement or reattachment is a high-volume Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group (MS-DRG). CMS has had many auditing entities – including the Recovery Auditors (RAs), Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) contractors, the Beneficiary and Family Centered Quality Improvement Organization (BFC-QIO), and Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) – performing reviews, all focusing on these joint replacement MS-DRGs. Medical necessity, quality of care, and compliance are always aspects of following CMS guidance.
This Major Joint Replacement CMS guidance outlines what specific clinical documentation should be included in the history and physical (H&P) and pre-/post-operative documentation, which is something with which physicians (providers) and hospital staff should be very familiar. This CMS information would be great to include in provider education activities, such as those conducted by coding and/or clinical documentation improvement (CDI).
The following outlines the CMS H&P documentation elements listed in the booklet.
The history should include information such as:
The physical examination should describe the joint examination with detailed objective findings, such as:
CMS further states that investigations should include the results of applicable tests (for example, plain radiographs and pre-operative imaging studies). Consultation records should also be kept for any associated co-morbidities, for example, cardiology consult, or diabetes management pre-, intra-, and post-operatively.
In addition, CMS also wants documentation to include “a statement of clinical judgment with reasons for deviating from a stepped-care approach.”
The CMS Major Joint Replacement booklet also contains guidance regarding pre- and post-operative documentation, and information to include in the health record (medical record), for which it provides several examples.
One other item that CMS describes in this booklet is the post-acute care transfer policy (PACT), which pays as transfers all cases assigned to certain DRGs if the patient was discharged to a psychiatric hospital or unit, an inpatient rehabilitation hospital or unit, a long-term care hospital, a children’s hospital, a cancer hospital, a skilled nursing facility (SNF), or a home health agency (HHA). This is another area on which to focus to achieve accuracy and compliance when conducting reviews. Also, remember that validation of the discharge disposition status code is important to include in your reviews/audits.
If your facility (hospital) performs these surgeries, reading over the CMS booklet would be a wise step to take. Run a data report on the specific MS-DRGs for a year and determine your volume; this will be helpful in conducting a review/audit. Here is a list of MS-DRG upon which you can focus:
In addition, even if you have already read this CMS booklet, look over the November 2020 version and utilize it when conducting a review/audit – and determine if your clinical documentation is meeting the CMS Major Joint Replacement requirements. Both coding and CDI professionals would be ideal to conduct this type of review and engage in ongoing education.
The Medicare Learning Network®, MLN Connects®, and MLN Matters® have registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS).
About the author: Gloryanne has worked in the HIM Coding and CDI areas of healthcare for more than 40 years. She currently is an independent Coding and CDI Consultant.
Picture this: You are driving through an area you don’t know well. It is a cold day. You stop to get gas. You fill the
Federal health officials have announced the launch of the Comprehensive Regulations to Uncover Suspicious Healthcare (CRUSH) initiative. The announcement was framed as a decisive step
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
