Back in April, I covered the end of the federal government’s declared COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE), which ended in May, and along with it, the start of one of the largest related program rollbacks: that of the Medicaid continuous coverage requirement.
This pandemic-era requirement directed states to keep Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled regardless of changes to their eligibility, in exchange for a boost in federal funding. When the requirement expired, states were able to resume income eligibility checks or redeterminations, for the first time since 2020.
Since that time, states have been terminating Medicaid coverage for millions of people who remained covered under the Medicaid program during the pandemic. So, I thought I would check in on how this has been unfolding over the last five or so months.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) initially estimated that over 15 million of 92 million Medicaid enrollees would lose coverage throughout the redetermination process. That’s 16 percent of total Medicaid beneficiaries. Additionally, of those 15 million, 7 million were expected to remain eligible for the program, but still lose their coverage because of administrative or bureaucratic hurdles, such as missed or poorly written notices or incorrect paperwork.
As of late September, a total of 7.5 million people nationwide had been disenrolled from their Medicaid coverage as a result of state redeterminations.
Another of CMS’s estimates was that one-third of the 15 million enrollees expected to lose Medicaid coverage as eligibility checks resumed would qualify for Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) coverage. Unfortunately, the Washington Post reported last week that as Medicaid rolls are being cut, few are finding refuge in PPACA plans.
Until now, federal officials have refused to release data showing how many people leaving Medicaid have an PPACA plan, but once they do, the initial figures are expected to lag.
The government requires Medicaid agencies to electronically transfer to marketplaces the cases of consumers who appear eligible for PPACA coverage. But some cases are transferred with outdated addresses or phone numbers, making it difficult for the exchanges to reach people who might benefit.
Furthermore, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the government has been actively collaborating with states to make sure Medicaid beneficiaries don’t lose coverage because of administrative issues. Alas, states continue to face challenges with Medicaid redeterminations all the same.
CMS believes that Medicaid eligibility systems in a number of states are programmed incorrectly and are conducting automatic renewals at the family level and not the individual level, even though individuals in a family may have different eligibility requirements to qualify for Medicaid. Correspondingly, HHS announced in a September press release that 30 states had reported such problems.
HHS has since noted that the agency will continue to work with states for as long as it’s needed to help prevent anyone eligible for Medicaid coverage from being disenrolled.
Although identifying this lingering issue, which has been leading to many coverage losses, is seen as a step in the right direction, coverage losses continue to occur more quickly than anticipated.
On the bright side, HHS just announced that the agency has helped 500,000 children and adults get their Medicaid coverage restored, while PPACA exchange directors have pointed out that marketplace health plans could become more popular over time.
However, millions of Medicaid beneficiaries are still without health insurance, and thousands more have the potential to still lose coverage via ongoing redeterminations, so it doesn’t seem like nearly enough is being done on a larger scale. There are clearly important lessons to be learned from the fallout thus far of the Medicaid continuous coverage requirement and its impact on continuity of care. Perhaps there will be a rosier outlook if we check back in another five months.
Picture this: You are driving through an area you don’t know well. It is a cold day. You stop to get gas. You fill the
Federal health officials have announced the launch of the Comprehensive Regulations to Uncover Suspicious Healthcare (CRUSH) initiative. The announcement was framed as a decisive step
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
