While drafting a presentation to the senior leadership committee, the presenter wants to know: should both functions be combined?
First, an interesting bit out of Becker’s today: the largest percentage of nurses leaving hospital work (or the profession) are those younger than 35. A much smaller percentage of the 49-plus crowd left many can afford to retire with union pensions or good 401K returns —whereas those between 35 and 49 pretty much stuck around. Nursing schools must not be teaching students that they are bullet-proof anymore. Being somewhere north of 35 I figure I’m good, nothing’s killed me yet.
Which brings me to my thoughts for today.
A fellow member of the American Case Management Association (ACMA) asked on our message board a question about formation of a CM/UM department. She is working on a presentation to the senior leadership about team structure, skills, profiles, and duties for the CM department. She is looking for suggestions on how to define the UM function.
Excellent question. Case management and UM can be structured in different ways: combining UM and CM into a single role or dividing them into separate roles in the same department. Some hospitals and systems have formed completely separate departments, often in a centralized, system-wide remote location. Personally, I think the last two are bad ideas, or at least more challenging to make them as effective as all falling under one department and on-site. Feel free to disagree. I still, have things to learn.
First, it’s not a job where old nurses with bad backs go to die — or physicians wanting to get off the train for a slower paced occupation as a PA. Boy, won’t you be disappointed! (Apologies to all nurses who were injured in the line of duty.) By all this I mean CM, UM and PA work are specialties demanding a certain acquired skill set. It starts with the right people:
How the position and unit are structured is dependent on the overall organization or system. My preference is and may always be based on personal interaction. I honestly don’t know how anyone gets the job done 100 percent remotely. I suspect there are both benefits (centralization) and drawbacks (lacking prior mentioned relational value). One day I may oversee one and I’ll get back to you.
UM is more than just evaluating a medical record, it’s having impact with the clinicians to teach them how to do the mundane, such as getting status orders right, to the more complex such as clinical documentation improvement. After all, who is better situated than someone who critiques medical records all day to talk with providers about CDI?
UM and CM department leadership are a part of the organization’s UM Committee: people who can identify trends and effectively present them to medical staff for consideration. An effective UM Committee is not only an information processing body, but an interpreting body with a mission to educate. And sometimes that is actually achieved.
To be clear, per the Medicare Conditions of Participation, the UM Committee has a wide-ranging scope beyond what the UM department brings to the table.
UM, CM, PA. All are specialties, not some add on ancillary service with poorly defined missions. Those of us in these specialties, especially those new to these roles, must start with self-respect, self-recognition and pride in our special place in organizational success.
Beginning in 2026, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will begin phasing out the Inpatient-Only (IPO) List by removing predominantly musculoskeletal and complex
Once again, a well-known consulting organization has mischaracterized the “incident-to” requirements. A few months ago, I wrote about an article that asserted you can’t bill
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
