Breaking Down Codes 93925 and 93926

Procedures involving lower extremities are often highlighted as a problem area for many CPT coders and healthcare compliance and regulatory professionals. Applying them correctly can be an area of confusion for many professionals. Let’s take time to examine and break down some of the details surrounding codes 93925 and 93926 for a duplex scan of the lower extremity arteries or arterial bypass grafts.

How is this code used?

Understand that real-time and Doppler studies are performed on the arteries of bilateral lower extremities. What does the scan encompass? The scan includes the full length of the common femoral, superficial, and popliteal arteries. Should the patient’s signs and symptoms warrant, the iliac, deep femoral and tibio-peroneal arteries should be included. It is important to assess Blood pressure (systolic) for this procedure. Report these codes under the circumstance that evaluation is performed of an arterial bypass within the lower extremity including the surrounding or adjacent vessels.

  • 93925 Duplex scan of lower extremity arteries or arterial bypass grafts; complete bilateral study
  • 93926 Duplex scan of lower extremity arteries or arterial bypass grafts; unilateral or limited study

Do duplex scans require both flow Doppler and spectral analysis?

Yes. All duplex scans require both color flow Doppler and spectral analysis. When only one of these portions of the study are performed, it should not be coded as a duplex procedure.

“Assessing flow with color, recording a waveform and reporting the findings in a medically indicated examination are the key elements to look for in a report.”Ultrasound Coding User’s Guide

Is it necessary to document the spectral analysis and color flow?

To assign the duplex codes, both spectral analysis and color flow must be documented. Duplex scans are a combination of ultrasound imaging, plus velocity measurements of blood flow (spectral analysis), and color flow.

What terms specify spectral analysis?

Terms indicating spectral analysis include:

  • acceleration rate
  • monophasic biphasic or triphasic waveforms
  • peak systolic velocity
  • resistive index (RI) velocity
  • waveform analysis
  • pulsed Doppler
  • spectral Doppler

Can noninvasive vascular diagnostic Doppler studies be reported with gray scale imagine?

Noninvasive vascular diagnostic Doppler studies may be reported with grayscale imaging codes when a thorough Doppler study is performed. However, when color Doppler is used only for structure identification (i.e., to determine whether or not a structure is vascular), this does not indicate that a duplex study CPT code should be used. Clinical Examples in Radiology, Volume 11, Issue 3, Summer, states that “if a grayscale evaluation of the organ involved is performed in addition to the duplex Doppler examination, each procedure or service should be reported separately or at least have a separate paragraph within the report.”

Could modifiers be required when reporting these codes?

It is best to check and verify if an NCCI-approved modifier may be required to indicate that a separate and distinct procedure was performed when Doppler studies are reported with some gray scale codes. Additionally, ensure that a thorough explanation of medical necessity is provided by the radiologist when a Doppler study is performed without an order from the referring physician. (Source: Clinical Examples in Radiology, Volume 14, Issue 1, Winter 2018).

What about modifier use for hospital-based services regarding the CMS-1500 claim form?

For hospital-based services, on the CMS-1500 claim form, assign modifier 26 to describe the professional component. For Medicare patients, hospitals will not need to assign the TC modifier as billing on the UB-04 claim form implies billing for the “technical component.”

If performed in a physician-owned, non-facility setting in which the physician owns the equipment, employs the staff, and performs and reads the study, no modifier is required as this constitutes global billing.

Other noteworthy tips and guidelines:

  • It is necessary to report code 93925 for a complete bilateral study. At a minimum, a complete exam consists of the full length of the common femoral, superficial femoral, and popliteal arteries.
  • When all required elements are not documented or a follow-up study is performed, report code 93926.
  • Understand that codes 93925 and 93926 are imaging studies, whereas 93922–93924 are non-imaging studies.
  • For iliac artery imaging only, assign code 93978 or 93979 as appropriate.
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Bryan Nordley

Bryan Nordley is a seasoned professional writer, strategist, and researcher with over a decade’s worth of combined experience. Bryan launched his professional health writing career at the University of British Columbia’s Faculty of Medicine, one of the top 30 faculty of medicine programs in the world, working under the School of Public Health as a communications assistant. From there, he expanded his expertise and knowledge into private healthcare and podiatry before taking the role of healthcare writer at MedLearn Media. Bryan is the lead writer for the MedLearn Publishing brand previously producing both the acclaimed radiology and laboratory compliance manager newsletter products, while currently writing the compliance questions of the week which reach over 10,000 subscribers, creating the MedLearn Publishing Insights blogs and collaborating with operations and nationally renowned subject matter experts, in addition to serving as an editor for a variety of MedLearn publications along with marketing initiatives. Bryan continues to keep his pulse on the latest healthcare industry news, analyzing and reporting with strategic insight.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025

Trending News

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24