Many people are still seething mad about Aetna’s devious plan to approve all inpatient admissions, but pay a lower rate for those that do not meet MCG’s nonexistent severity criteria. Well, I hope you have saved some seething for Blue Cross of North Carolina.
What are they going to do? Well, as usual, the details are scant, but starting Feb. 1 , they will have a new policy for inpatient status approval for elective procedures that simply states they will no longer approve inpatient status in advance of an elective surgery, and that “the level of care will be determined based on the member’s clinical condition following the procedure.”
Now, it should be clear to all that unlike Aetna’s policy, which is legal but immoral, this policy is a blatant violation of the federal regulations governing Medicare Advantage (MA) coverage of basic benefits. Blue Cross of North Carolina is not only disregarding the Inpatient-Only List, which does not require a specific clinical condition for a surgery to be compliantly billed as inpatient, but it also does not acknowledge the case-by-case exception that allows inpatient admission prior to surgery, based on the physician’s determination that inpatient admission is warranted prior to surgery due to potential risk or complexity – not to mention the two-midnight benchmark that allows inpatient admission for patients who require over two midnights of necessary hospital care.
As if attempting to legitimize it, they go on to state that “this change aligns with CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) guidelines and supports appropriate site-of-service utilization. Providers should continue to follow standard authorization processes for the procedure itself.” Yet when I looked up their prior authorization policy, the list of surgeries requiring prior authorization is very limited, consisting of common surgeries such as joint replacement, spine procedures, cardiac surgery, gynecologic, urologic, and gastrointestinal procedures, which require no prior authorization.
But then that same policy states that all scheduled inpatient admissions do require prior authorization. So, if the doctor wants to do a multi-level cervical spine fusion as inpatient for a high-risk patient, you do not need to get prior authorization for the surgery itself, but you do need to get prior authorization for the inpatient admission – but at the same time, they will not allow prior authorization for inpatient admission in advance of a surgery. And if everything goes well, it seems that they will assess, as they claim, the “clinical condition” after surgery – and probably deny inpatient admission, because the outcome was good.
Now, I will note that Blue Cross has indicated that additional guidance will be available in the coming weeks, so perhaps that will outline a compliant procedure, but I am not optimistic. I do expect that North Carolina hospitals will be closely watching this and providing Blue Cross feedback, hopefully before implementation, and before other Blue Cross plans copy this tactic.
There is one other related issue to discuss. With the impending abolition of the Inpatient-Only List – which includes a prohibition on denials of admission status for surgeries removed from the List, until CMS allows them – the question came up of whether that applies to Medicare Advantage (MA) plans. And since that denial prohibition is actually part of the federal regulations at 42 CFR 412.3, subsection 2, it seems that they cannot deny such claims for improper status. Now, of course, this may simply lead them all to adopt Aetna’s tactic to approve inpatient admission, but pay the claim at a reduced rate. So, keep a close eye on the online policy addendums for your MA plans, and alert your contracting team to another impending hit to revenue.
Beginning in 2026, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will begin phasing out the Inpatient-Only (IPO) List by removing predominantly musculoskeletal and complex
Once again, a well-known consulting organization has mischaracterized the “incident-to” requirements. A few months ago, I wrote about an article that asserted you can’t bill
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
