Today I have a few newsworthy items for you.
First, Medicare updated one of the Manuals with information on billing for patients who are in the custody of a penal authority. You can find that in the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, Chapter 16, section 40.7. But from my review, there is really nothing new, suggesting that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is simply putting into the Manual what has been established policy.
As a reminder, payment for care rendered to patients who are considered “in custody” is the responsibility of the incarcerating agency. And this actually falls into a broader category of Medicare payment exclusions that is outlined in 42 CFR § 411.4, which prohibits Medicare payment when neither the individual beneficiary nor any other person or organization (by reason of such individual’s membership in a prepayment plan/insurance or otherwise) has a legal obligation to pay for the item or service.
That means that unless the jail or prison charges all patients for medical care, Medicare will not pay for care provided to those patients who have Medicare coverage.
But most importantly, this is a chance for me to remind you that the term “in custody” in this regulation also refers to escaped prisoners. So if an escaped prisoner presents to your hospital for care and is a Medicare beneficiary, you are obligated to find out from where they escaped and bill that entity for the medical care (and not Medicare).
Moving on, as some of you know, I am allergic to clinical documentation integrity (CDI); just talking about it gives me hives. But I have once again premedicated to be able to share a brief update. The diagnosis of malnutrition is one that payers love to remove from claims in order to pay the hospital less.
And two weeks ago, the New England Journal of Medicine published a review article on malnutrition in older adults. This article referred to Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria without a mention of American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) criteria. This means that payers will latch onto this authoritative journal and demand patients meet those criteria to validate the diagnosis.
You can certainly fight for the right to use ASPEN, but CDI teams should be certain to review the GLIM criteria and anticipate the possibility of increased denials.
Finally, it appears that the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) inappropriately paid some claims under the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs (CHAMPVA) for patients who had other insurance as far back as 2021, and they are going to demand refunds. But after you refund the payment, via an online portal, they say you can bill the primary insurance, and if that claim is rejected, you can then resubmit the claim for payment.
Now, I would love to know if they really think any insurer is going to pay a claim that is submitted more than one year after the date of service. We all know every such claim will be rejected, and then the provider must go through the resubmission process, only to get the payment they just refunded. Talk about government inefficiency; how hard would it be to put an edit only asking for repayment for claims within the last year?
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.
While the coverage of telehealth is definitely a good thing, it has caused needless confusion. I would like to address a little of that today.
Compliance teams get nervous when rules are not followed. And when an expired form is used, they get really nervous. Thankfully, there is one fewer
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
