If you listened to last week’s edition of the RACmonitor-produced Internet broadcast Monitor Mondays, you heard a reminder from Nancy Beckley that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has released a new version of the Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN), and that using the old version will automatically render it invalid.
You may also recall that I first announced the news about this new version back in April when it was first released, and that I suggested you start cleaning out your file cabinets. At that time, the new ABN had gone through all the steps, including posting on the Paperwork Reduction Act page, and had been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). I also noted that the sample ABNs CMS posted on the ABN website use abbreviations, yet the use of abbreviations in the past has led to contractors ruling an ABN invalid.
Because I did not want to be hypercritical of CMS at that time and thought one critique was enough, I did not mention that past ABNs had indicated an approval date on the bottom of the form. Out of the blue, CMS changed it to an expiration date on this new version. Of course, they have the right to change their own form, but now the ABN violates its own instructions in the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 30, section 50.6.1, which notes that “ABNs are effective as of the OMB approval date given at the bottom of each notice.”
So why did I decide that now was the right time to be hypercritical of CMS, besides the fact that my loyal readers expect it of me? Well, CMS just posted new versions of the Important Message from Medicare (IMM) and the Detailed Notice of Discharge (DND) on the Hospital Discharge Appeal Notices web page. And if Juliet Ugarte Hopkins, MD, a member of the RACmonitor editorial board, had not noticed this, we would all still be in the dark.
What does “being in the dark” mean in this situation? It means that hospitals that did not use the updated forms would be violating a key federal regulatory notice requirement and could be at risk of losing their accreditation.
While ABNs are used in acute-care hospitals only occasionally, every single Medicare-eligible patient admitted as inpatient gets a copy of the Important Message from Medicare. And how important does CMS think this is? Well, they did put the word “important” in the name of the form.
Speaking of importance, did you know that CMS estimates that each year almost 24 million initial notices are issued and over 3.4 million hours are spent distributing them? If hospitals dedicate that much time to one piece of paper, it better be important!
But in light of all this, why did CMS not send out one single email about the new form, not add it to the weekly MLN Connects edition, or do any outreach at all? It is beyond explanation (although CMS should provide one, along with an apology).
I should point out that aside from the change from a date of approval to a date of expiration, the new form only differs from the old form by the addition of two lines at the bottom concerning non-discrimination as it pertains to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Perhaps they waited 44 years to add this language so they could say a five-year wait to get an appeal heard at the administrative law judge (ALJ) level is not such a long time, relatively speaking.
So don’t delay: go to https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-General-Information/BNI and in the left-hand column you will see a link for the FFS ABN page. Click there to get the updated ABN and a link to the Hospital Discharge Appeal Notices for the updated IMM and DND.
And be sure that the new forms are used hospital-wide; if a surveyor shows up and asks to see your current form, it will not be pretty should the old ones still be in use.
EDITOR’S NOTE: The author of this article used AI-assisted tools in its composition, but all content, analysis, and conclusions were based on the author’s professional
While the coverage of telehealth is definitely a good thing, it has caused needless confusion. I would like to address a little of that today.
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
