An examination of areas of focus to reduce wasteful healthcare spending on services with little to no clinical benefit, and finding opportunities in improving the quality of care.
“Low-value care” is a common term, quite frequently used in discussions of healthcare spending and patient quality of care for some time now. More action has been taken on the issue of late, as we have seen an increase in consistent efforts made to reduce the use of low-value services in clinical settings.
No single factor drives the use of low-value services by providers, but rather it is a combination of several different causes, such as established clinical practices and workflows, information disparities, patient expectations, litigation concerns, and fee-for-service payment systems. The fact is, a staggering amount of healthcare is considered non-essential. To put it into perspective, over one-fifth of all medical care may be unnecessary, according to several studies and surveys of physicians.
Though the issue of low-value care is a global one, the problem of overspending and underperforming in healthcare is most significant here in the United States. The U.S. spends more on healthcare per capita and as a percentage of GDP than any other country, upwards of $340 billion per year. However, we do not see outcomes proportionate to that spending.
With pressure to reduce costs and improve quality for Medicare programs and throughout the U.S. healthcare system, reducing the use of low-value services must be a priority for providers and patients.
To tackle the issue and design a successful resolution strategy, a comprehensive understanding of low-value care and its impact on health outcomes is essential to identifying and ultimately reducing its occurrence in healthcare.
Defining Low-Value Services
To address the issue of low-value care, there must be agreement on what would be considered a low-value service. Low-value care is typically defined as medically unnecessary services, providing no health benefits to patients, incurring unnecessary costs to patients, or wasting limited healthcare resources. In some cases, low-value care can be harmful to the patient and/or lead to further unnecessary testing or treatment.
A recently formed Task Force on Low-Value Care, comprised of leading purchasers, patient advocates, employer coalitions, and other healthcare stakeholders, identified a list of the top five low-value clinical services. The services on the list were deemed common, unsafe, failing to improve health, or a combination of those traits. In addition, the services were selected based on several variances, such as their association with direct and indirect harm, their cost, and their prevalence.
The Task Force suggests that organizations prioritize its recommendations in their efforts to identify, measure, and reduce low-value care. The top five services identified are:
It is recommended that individual health providers determine their specific low-value services, starting with a peer review. Identifying and minimizing low-value care could lead to substantial savings quickly, and create opportunities for increased expenditures on high-value services.
Efforts to Reduce Low-Value Services.
Healthcare organizations throughout the nation are increasingly implementing initiatives to reduce their use of unnecessary services and overtreatment, given the high cost and potential harm of low-value care.
Many different approaches can be taken in order to tackle the issue. However, here are a few foundational strategies for reducing low-value services:
There are several different ways to reduce low-value health services. As a whole, the healthcare community is making significant progress in tackling the issue, with national education and awareness campaigns and an increased focus on reducing healthcare waste. However, we have a long way to go.
Ultimately, healthcare providers must prioritize eliminating waste to achieve the true transformation needed in the quality and cost-efficiency of health services.
Programming Note: Listen to Susan Gatehouse report this story live today during Talk Ten Tuesdays, 10 Eastern.
Picture this: You are driving through an area you don’t know well. It is a cold day. You stop to get gas. You fill the
Risk adjustment has entered a new era. We are no longer operating in a documentation optimization environment; we are operating in an enforcement and recalibration
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
