Atrial Fibrillation versus Atrial Flutter – Coding Considerations

Atrial Fibrillation versus Atrial Flutter – Coding Considerations

Today we are going to take a look at atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: the difference between the two, the different types, and how to code them. 

First, there’s what is the same – atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter are both arrhythmias of the heart that originate in the atria. Both conditions may also share some of the same etiologies and symptoms. 

According to cardiovasculardiseasehub, atrial fibrillation is more complex, with a more irregular rhythm than atrial flutter. This is due to the electrical signals in the atria becoming disorganized, which is what makes the atria “fibrillate” or quiver, instead of contracting as normal. This then leads to that irregular rhythm noted in atrial fibrillation. In atrial flutter, on the other hand, the atria beats very rapidly, but in a regular pattern. An electrocardiogram can show differences as well. In atrial flutter, the ECG shows P waves in a “sawtooth” pattern. In atrial fibrillation, an irregular rhythm is noted, without those P waves identified.  

Atrial fibrillation and flutter share common etiologies of hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and valvular heart disease. “AFib,” as it is commonly called, can also be due to hyperthyroidism and sleep apnea, and is more common in those over 65; the incidence increases with age. A flutter can also be seen in patients who have had a previous heart surgery. Both conditions share common symptoms of palpitations, fatigue, dizziness, shortness of breath and chest discomfort. Both conditions also raise the patient’s risk of a stroke, but the risk is greater with atrial fibrillation due to the nature of the electrical impulses and the higher likelihood of blood stasis in the atria. 

According to WebMD, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation occurs when the heartbeat returns to normal within seven days, either with or without treatment. We would assign I48.0 for paroxysmal AFib. Persistent AFib lasts longer than a week and would be coded to I48.19. If the persistent AFib is documented to be longstanding, it has lasted more than a year and has not resolved. Longstanding, persistent AFib would be coded to I48.11. We also do have some Coding Clinic guidance on atrial fibrillation I would encourage you to review. The edition published for the second quarter of 2019 instructs us that when there are various types of AFib documented, we should only assign one code for the specific type of AFib, since some of the terms are less specific and some of the types can’t clinically occur together. It also notes that permanent AFib is persistent or longstanding when cardioversion as a treatment is not indicated or can’t be performed. Permanent AFib would be coded to I48.21. 

In coding atrial flutter, we can assign I48.92 for unspecified atrial flutter in addition to options for typical or type 1 atrial flutter and atypical or type 2 atrial flutter. According to WebMD, typical atrial flutter is more common (as the name would suggest). This type also involves the tricuspid valve and causes abnormal electrical signals in the right atrium. Typical atrial flutter would be assigned to I48.3. Atypical atrial flutter can occur in either the right or the left atrium, and it does not involve the tricuspid valve. Atypical atrial flutter would be assigned to I48.4. WebMD does note that atrial flutter that comes and goes could be referred to as paroxysmal atrial flutter, and flutter that continues for a longer period of time could be considered persistent atrial flutter. We do not have codes for this specificity…yet.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC

Chris began her health information management career in 1986, working in hospitals and as a consultant. With expertise in ICD-10 coding, audits, and education, she has contributed to compliance reviews and coding programs. She holds a Master's from Washington University, a B.S. from Saint Louis University, and has taught coding at Saint Louis University. Chris is certified in HCC risk-adjusted coding and is active in health management associations.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025
2026 IPPS Masterclass 3: Master MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 3: MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

This third session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review of FY26 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 14, 2025
2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 2: Master ICD-10-PCS Changes

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 2: Master ICD-10-PCS Changes

This second session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review the FY26 changes to ICD-10-PCS codes. This information will be presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 13, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025
The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.

June 19, 2025
Open Door Forum Webcast Series

Open Door Forum Webcast Series

Bring your questions and join the conversation during this open forum series, live every Wednesday at 10 a.m. EST from June 11–July 30. Hosted by Chuck Buck, these fast-paced 30-minute sessions connect you directly with top healthcare experts tackling today’s most urgent compliance and policy issues.

June 11, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24