ASC Partnership as a Hospital without Walls

Easing back into the new “Normal.”

Everyone is anxious for life to return to normal, but none more than those patients who had planned to have surgery in March or April, but had their surgery cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These patients have conditions that warrant surgery, but were deemed not to be urgent or emergent, and therefore could safely be delayed.

Consider one of the most common surgeries performed, the total joint replacement. These are classified as elective surgeries. But for the person with severe arthritis who can no longer walk down to the mailbox, and has exhausted all conservative measures, that surgery is not one they want to put off any longer than necessary. The same issues apply to a person with vision-limiting cataracts. Though he or she will never die from their cataracts, being unable to drive or read the morning newspaper has a major effect on their activities of daily living.

On the other hand, no one wants patients or medical personnel to be harmed by rushing to resume surgeries while COVID-19 remains prevalent. As more is learned about this virus, there is increasing apprehension among providers. The pre-symptomatic phase of infection can last several days, making screening prior to surgery vitally important. Data from China found that when patients were screened simply with questions about fever, cough, and other symptoms prior to surgery, infected SARS-CoV-2 patients can still be missed. In one small published report, over 20 percent of the 38 pre-symptomatic patients who underwent surgery died.

Many hospitals are already planning for resumption of surgery by dedicating preoperative, operating room, and recovery room staff and rooms to these patients. Yet that still exposes the patient to the hospital environment and its inherent risks. Patients who require an overnight stay, or longer, must be isolated from other patients to avoid infection, yet this is not optimal, since COVID-19 patients may still be in the same facility. Ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) provide a more controlled environment, but are limited by state and federal laws to performing only ambulatory surgeries.

But there may be another option. Under the 1135 waiver allowing hospitals to operate without walls, any hospital may contract with an ASC to provide services “under arrangement.” Under such an arrangement, the care is provided at the ASC, but billed by the hospital as if the service was provided in the hospital, by hospital staff. With this arrangement, all types of surgery could be performed at the ASC, including surgery designated by Medicare as “inpatient only.” The only limitation would be the availability of nursing staff 24 hours a day, and the availability of proper equipment and access to consulting physicians, if needed. Since the ASC will be operating under the hospital’s license, nurses from the hospital can be reassigned to the ASC to supplement the ASC staff, and the medical staff at the hospital can provide services to the patients at the ASC using their hospital privileges. These visits can also be provided remotely by telehealth.

The billing for the surgery would be based on the designated status, inpatient or outpatient, and paid at the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) or Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) rate to the hospital, including any amounts for IME, DSH, and other add-ons. The hospital would then pay the ASC at an agreed-upon rate. As the OPPS rate for any surgery is significantly higher than the ASC rate, both parties could be made whole from such an arrangement – and, of course, the setting has no effect on the physician’s professional fee.

Since the ASC would be operating under the hospital’s license under arrangement, the patient’s medical record and all billing information must be available at the hospital. This should be relatively easy to accomplish by “printing” the record to an electronic document and uploading that to the patient’s chart at the hospital. 

While your legal, compliance, and finance staff would need to provide significant input into such an arrangement, the ability to start performing most surgeries in a COVID-19-free environment, with the ability to keep patients “hospitalized” as long as medically necessary, will let almost all patients get the care they need. This seems like a win-win-win-win for patients, doctors, ASCs, and hospitals.

Programming Note:  Ronald Hirsch, MD is a permanent panelist on Monitor Mondays. Listen to his live reporting every Monday at 10-10:30 a.m. EST.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, ACPA-C, CHCQM, CHRI

Ronald Hirsch, MD, is vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at R1 Physician Advisory Services. Dr. Hirsch’s career in medicine includes many clinical leadership roles at healthcare organizations ranging from acute-care hospitals and home health agencies to long-term care facilities and group medical practices. In addition to serving as a medical director of case management and medical necessity reviewer throughout his career, Dr. Hirsch has delivered numerous peer lectures on case management best practices and is a published author on the topic. He is a member of the Advisory Board of the American College of Physician Advisors, and the National Association of Healthcare Revenue Integrity, a member of the American Case Management Association, and a Fellow of the American College of Physicians. Dr. Hirsch is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is regular panelist on Monitor Mondays. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, policies, or opinions of R1 RCM, Inc. or R1 Physician Advisory Services (R1 PAS).

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24