One of the issues that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) addressed in its new rule for Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, CMS-4201-F, was the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and automated protocols to deny care. And obviously, their guidance was that this was not acceptable.
Just to clarify, the MA plans were using AI to predict the length of stay for inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) admissions, skilled nursing facility (SNF) care, and home health episodes of care. If the AI program said a patient needed eight days in the SNF, they refused to pay at day 9. CMS explained that before discontinuing coverage, the plan must review the patient’s specific clinical needs and compare that to Medicare coverage guidelines, and they must approve continuing care if the patient still meets the Medicare criteria, regardless of the AI prediction.
Now, how does this AI work? Well, they take millions of past admissions and use those patient characteristics and lengths of stay to then predict the length of stay for the current patient.
Well, if you think about it, many hospitals do the exact same thing to their doctors. They have staff who determine the working Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) for each patient and then use the Medicare geometric mean length of stay (GMLOS) to tell the doctor when they expect their patient to be discharged. But just like these AI programs, Medicare’s GMLOS is based on thousands and thousands of admissions in that DRG, and in no way is it intended to predict the expected length of stay of any one patient. Think about it: to hit the highest-weighted DRG in a triad, the patient needs one major complication or comorbidity (MCC). But does anyone think the length of stay is going to be the same for a patient with one MCC, compared to the patient with two MCCs and three CCs? Of course not. But that’s what happens. So, stop using the GMLOS like this, unless you want to also give your MA plans permission to use their own AI tools.
On another note, as many of you may know, one of the other big topics in healthcare reform, other than Medicare Advantage and price transparency, is prior authorization. No one likes prior authorization, and CMS has proposed rules to rein in insurers. But you may recall that traditional Medicare has its own prior authorization program for specific services performed in the hospital outpatient setting.
When this program was introduced, many were surprised that CMS limited it to the hospital outpatient setting and excluded inpatient surgeries and surgeries performed at surgery centers. Well, it appears that may soon change. In a notice published two weeks ago, CMS announced that they are creating a prior authorization process for ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) as a demonstration project to “develop improved procedures for the identification, investigation, and prosecution of Medicare fraud occurring in ambulatory surgical centers providing services to Medicare beneficiaries.”
Unfortunately, we have few details of this new process, and no idea when it will begin, nor what surgeries will require prior authorization. But this process will differ from the outpatient hospital process. For hospitals, obtaining a prior authorization is a condition of payment, so if it is not done, the hospital gets paid nothing, with no appeal rights.
But CMS has said that for ASCs, if the prior authorization is not obtained, the Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) will simply contact the ASC and request the records to determine if the claim should be paid. Now, why is this different? Well, CMS said they were limited by regulatory and statutory differences between ASCs and hospitals.
As I have reported here, CMS stated that about 20 percent of hospital outpatient prior authorizations are denied at first pass, so it will be interesting to watch how ASCs perform.
I will also note that in the description of the hospital outpatient program, CMS talks about reducing improper payments, but in the CMS notice on the ASC program, they state that their intent is to identify and prosecute fraud. That’s serious talk; was this the intention?
No one knows.
Well, I gave you all a break from my criticism of insurance company policies and ploys last week, and I had planned to go for
If you are just crawling out from under a rock, note that last week, we had an election in this country. Republicans won the White
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.
Optimize your outpatient clinical documentation and gain comprehensive knowledge from foundational practices to advanced technologies, ensuring improved patient care and organizational and financial success. This webcast bundle provides a holistic approach to outpatient CDI, empowering you to implement best practices from the ground up and leverage advanced strategies for superior results. You will gain actionable insights to improve documentation quality, patient care, compliance, and financial outcomes.
Enhancing outpatient clinical documentation is crucial for maintaining accuracy, compliance, and proper reimbursement in today’s complex healthcare environment. This webcast, presented by industry expert Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, will provide you with actionable strategies to tackle complex challenges in outpatient documentation. You’ll learn how to craft detailed clinical narratives, utilize advanced EHR features, and implement accurate risk adjustment and HCC coding. The session also covers essential regulatory updates to keep your documentation practices compliant. Join us to gain the tools you need to improve documentation quality, support better patient care, and ensure financial integrity.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Healthcare organizations face complex regulatory requirements under the No Surprises Act and Price Transparency rules. These policies mandate extensive fee disclosures across settings, and confusion is widespread—many hospitals remain unaware they must post every contracted rate. Non-compliance could lead to costly penalties, financial loss, and legal risks. Join David M. Glaser Esq. as he shows you how to navigate these regulations effectively.
Protect your facility from unwanted audits! Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, and take a deep dive into both the CMS and AMA guidelines for reporting post operative pain blocks. You’ll learn how to determine if the nerve block is separately codable with real life examples for better understanding. Becky will also cover how to evaluate whether documentation supports medical necessity, offer recommendations for stronger documentation practices, and provide guidance on educating providers about documentation requirements. She’ll include a discussion of appropriate modifier and diagnosis coding assignment so that you can be confident that your billing of post operative pain blocks is fully supported and compliant.
During this RACmonitor webcast Dr. Ronald Hirsch spotlights the areas of the OIG’s Work Plan and the findings of their most recent audits that impact utilization review, case management, and audit staff. He also provides his common-sense interpretation of the prevailing regulations related to those target issues. You’ll walk away better equipped with strategies to put in place immediately to reduce your risk of paybacks, increased scrutiny, and criminal penalties.
Copyright © 2024 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
