Questions still linger regarding specifics of implementation.
By Mark Spivey
Arkansas has become the nation’s third state to implement a work requirement for Medicaid, according to an announcement made earlier this week by Governor Asa Hutchinson and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Seema Verma.
The state expects to notify applicable Medicaid recipients during the first week of April and require a select group to report on their work, education, and training activities by the start of June, according to a report published in Healthcare Dive.
The report noted that Arkansas has not yet won approval for a part of the proposal that would change the income requirement for Medicaid to 100 percent of the federal poverty level (instead of 138 percent).
“The Arkansas Department of Human Services estimated the work requirement and its planned income requirement would save the state $356 million in the next fiscal year. Most of that amount ($307 million) would come from the income requirement change,” Healthcare Dive’s report read. “Implementing both waivers would also result in nearly 63,000 people losing Medicaid coverage out of the more than 285,000 who currently get insurance through Medicaid in the state.”
Kentucky and Indiana are the two other Republican-led states that have introduced plans for a Medicaid work requirement, although Arkansas reportedly wants to be the first to actually implement one. In making the announcement, Verma reportedly said there are also eight other states with Medicaid work requirement waiver requests, with still others that have shown interest.
“In announcing the Arkansas work requirement waiver at the State House in Little Rock on Monday, Hutchinson said the state and CMS decided to move forward with launching the work requirement and not wait until they iron out the income eligibility piece,” Healthcare Dive’s report read. “The governor said the work requirement isn’t about ‘punishing anyone,’ but instead giving ‘people an opportunity to work.’ Hutchinson said the work requirement includes training and education programs to help people get out of poverty and jobs.”
Verma reportedly described CMS as a “willing partner” with states showing similar proclivities.
The work requirement ultimately is said to be poised to affect Arkansas Works enrollees (those who receive coverage through Medicaid expansion) between 19 and 49 years old, with the Natural State easing in the requirement for 30-to-49-year-olds between June and September. Recipients will need to report 80 hours of work every month, to include job training, job searching, school, health education classes, or volunteering; those who don’t meet the requirement for any three months in a calendar year will reportedly lose coverage.
The plan has been met with fierce opposition in a nation with wealth inequality that has worsened dramatically during recent decades while working-class wages have stagnated.
“Critics say work requirements will only serve to make access to care more difficult for those who need it most. The majority of Medicaid beneficiaries are already from working families, but the requirement’s bureaucratic hurdles and paperwork needs could leave out those who should qualify,” Healthcare Dive noted.
“The harsh work requirement in Medicaid will likely set back the state’s considerable progress under the (Patient Protection) and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) in increasing coverage and improving access to care, health, and financial stability for low-income Arkansans,” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities Vice President Judith Solomon noted in a blog post.
Last year, Arkansas implemented a “work referral” process for Arkansas Works and has tracked how people referred to job searches and training have been progressing.
“The results of the referral showed that individuals who take advantage of these services are more likely to find a job than those who do not. Shifting from a voluntary ‘referral’ to a mandatory requirement that individuals work in order to receive their health insurance is expected to increase the number of enrollees who take advantage of state programs to assist in developing skills and obtaining jobs,” Hutchinson’s office said in a press release.
Picture this: You are driving through an area you don’t know well. It is a cold day. You stop to get gas. You fill the
Coders may very well feel that they have no impact on hospitals under H.R.1, the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). Just the opposite
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
