All or Nothing – Inpatient or Outpatient, a Patient Either Requires Hospital Care, or Doesn’t

In honor of National Case Management Week, I am covering a topic that, while a repeat, is so widely misunderstood (particularly by government contractors!) that it merits repetition.

I am going to reexplain why there is absolutely no such thing as a Medicare three-day observation stay. It simply cannot exist. I am going to repeat that for emphasis: it is absolutely impossible to have a Medicare observation stay that lasts three or more days. The complexities of regulations often prevent this type of declarative statement.

Why is this different?    

The answer is the Two-Midnight Rule.

Under the Medicare Two-Midnight Rule, which you can find at 42 CFR 412.3, “an inpatient admission is generally appropriate for payment under Medicare Part A when the admitting physician expects the patient to require hospital care that crosses two midnights.” As soon as a physician expects a Medicare patient’s hospital stay to last through a second midnight, the physician should order inpatient admission.

If it is 11:59 p.m. immediately before the second midnight, the doctor should be entering an admission order, unless they think the world is going to end or the patient is walking out in the next 60 seconds. 

Now, I know some people, and many Medicare auditors, are saying “but wait, what if the patient only requires observation? You can’t order inpatient admission when the patient only requires observation!”

But those people are totally wrong. Ask yourself this question: is observation care hospital care? Obviously, the answer is yes. They are not getting the “observation” at a movie or at a restaurant; they are getting it in the hospital.

“Observation” is a type of hospital care. Under the regulation, when “hospital care” is expected to last past the second midnight, the status of the patient moves from being outpatient to inpatient. Outpatient and inpatient are statuses.

When a patient requires hospital care that is expected to last fewer than two midnights, they are an outpatient. When the care is expected to last more than two midnights, which it obviously is, if it has already lasted two midnights, the patient is an inpatient. That is true even if the patient is sitting in a bed in the ED hallway.

There is no geographic component to the test. If they are in the hospital, requiring hospital care, and expected to need it for two midnights, they should be admitted.      

Now, you might be thinking, “what if the patient is not really that sick?” Well, if they are not sick enough to require “hospital care,” then the patient should not be in the hospital at all. Inpatient and outpatient are not different levels of care; they are different patient statuses.

If the patient doesn’t require hospital care, it is improper to bill for any service. The test is the length of time the patient is expected to need hospital care. If they need any type of hospital care for two midnights, they are an inpatient. If they don’t need hospital care, they are nothing. Okay, that’s too cold. They are still a human being.

But they have no status in the hospital. They are effectively a visitor. And if they want to stay in the hospital, they are going to have to pay out-of-pocket for that privilege. So, when a Medicare patient is in the hospital more than two nights, they are an inpatient or they are self-pay. Those are the only two options available!

Finally, Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are required to offer coverage at least as generous as Medicare. (See 42 CFR 422.101.) If a Medicare Advantage plan tries to disregard the Two-Midnight Rule, refer them to the regulation. If that fails, I recommend contacting the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to have them correct the plan’s legal violations.

EDITOR’S NOTE:

The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

David M. Glaser, Esq.

David M. Glaser is a shareholder in Fredrikson & Byron's Health Law Group. David assists clinics, hospitals, and other health care entities negotiate the maze of healthcare regulations, providing advice about risk management, reimbursement, and business planning issues. He has considerable experience in healthcare regulation and litigation, including compliance, criminal and civil fraud investigations, and reimbursement disputes. David's goal is to explain the government's enforcement position, and to analyze whether this position is supported by the law or represents government overreaching. David is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is a popular guest on Monitor Mondays.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 19, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025
The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.

June 19, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24