In honor of National Case Management Week, I am covering a topic that, while a repeat, is so widely misunderstood (particularly by government contractors!) that it merits repetition.
I am going to reexplain why there is absolutely no such thing as a Medicare three-day observation stay. It simply cannot exist. I am going to repeat that for emphasis: it is absolutely impossible to have a Medicare observation stay that lasts three or more days. The complexities of regulations often prevent this type of declarative statement.
Why is this different?
The answer is the Two-Midnight Rule.
Under the Medicare Two-Midnight Rule, which you can find at 42 CFR 412.3, “an inpatient admission is generally appropriate for payment under Medicare Part A when the admitting physician expects the patient to require hospital care that crosses two midnights.” As soon as a physician expects a Medicare patient’s hospital stay to last through a second midnight, the physician should order inpatient admission.
If it is 11:59 p.m. immediately before the second midnight, the doctor should be entering an admission order, unless they think the world is going to end or the patient is walking out in the next 60 seconds.
Now, I know some people, and many Medicare auditors, are saying “but wait, what if the patient only requires observation? You can’t order inpatient admission when the patient only requires observation!”
But those people are totally wrong. Ask yourself this question: is observation care hospital care? Obviously, the answer is yes. They are not getting the “observation” at a movie or at a restaurant; they are getting it in the hospital.
“Observation” is a type of hospital care. Under the regulation, when “hospital care” is expected to last past the second midnight, the status of the patient moves from being outpatient to inpatient. Outpatient and inpatient are statuses.
When a patient requires hospital care that is expected to last fewer than two midnights, they are an outpatient. When the care is expected to last more than two midnights, which it obviously is, if it has already lasted two midnights, the patient is an inpatient. That is true even if the patient is sitting in a bed in the ED hallway.
There is no geographic component to the test. If they are in the hospital, requiring hospital care, and expected to need it for two midnights, they should be admitted.
Now, you might be thinking, “what if the patient is not really that sick?” Well, if they are not sick enough to require “hospital care,” then the patient should not be in the hospital at all. Inpatient and outpatient are not different levels of care; they are different patient statuses.
If the patient doesn’t require hospital care, it is improper to bill for any service. The test is the length of time the patient is expected to need hospital care. If they need any type of hospital care for two midnights, they are an inpatient. If they don’t need hospital care, they are nothing. Okay, that’s too cold. They are still a human being.
But they have no status in the hospital. They are effectively a visitor. And if they want to stay in the hospital, they are going to have to pay out-of-pocket for that privilege. So, when a Medicare patient is in the hospital more than two nights, they are an inpatient or they are self-pay. Those are the only two options available!
Finally, Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are required to offer coverage at least as generous as Medicare. (See 42 CFR 422.101.) If a Medicare Advantage plan tries to disregard the Two-Midnight Rule, refer them to the regulation. If that fails, I recommend contacting the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to have them correct the plan’s legal violations.
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.
You are probably aware that many Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are claiming that due to new rules issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Directly contradicting another person can carry the potential to feel antagonistic or rude. But in the realm of compliance, it’s also often necessary. Rules are
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
