Once a year, for the past eight years, the U.S. Attorney General has announced his or her annual healthcare fraud enforcement efforts in the form of the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) “National Health Care Fraud Takedown.” The Takedown, which compiles the year’s healthcare fraud-enforcement actions, is a reflection of the DOJ’s healthcare fraud-enforcement priorities. This year’s Takedown is notable in both its size and its emphasis.
A DOJ graph and map tracking the number of defendants charged and federal districts participating in healthcare fraud-enforcement actions show a steady rise in both between 2013 and present. The facts culminating in this year’s takedown with charges against an impressive 412 individuals, responsible for $1.3 billion in fraud losses, across 41 federal districts.
Unlike previous years, however, the 2017 takedown shows that the DOJ and its partners in the Medicare Fraud Strike Force have targeted medical professionals who have contributed to the opioid epidemic. Of the 412 defendants charged, 120 (or 34 percent) were charged with crimes involving opioid prescription and/or distribution or the treatment of opioid addiction.
In his remarks at last week’s press conference, Attorney General Sessions noted that this was “the largest opioid-related fraud takedown in American history.”
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary (HHS), Thomas Price, MD, described the opioid epidemic as a “national scourge” and noted that the emphasis of this year’s national takedown operation was on “aggressively targeting individuals who have maliciously contributed to America’s opioid epidemic while also engaging in healthcare fraud.”
Of the 412 defendants targeted in the takedown, Attorney General Sessions only highlighted three defendants in his remarks, and all of them were charged with opioid-related fraud. A closer look at each of these cases shows the ways in which healthcare professionals have contributed to the opioid epidemic and how DOJ is seeking to stem the tide by deterring this conduct. The first two cases involve the improper prescription and/or distribution of opioids whereas the third case involves fraud arising from the treatment of individuals suffering from opioid addiction.
Improper Prescription and Distribution of Opioids
The first case, starting with the most brazen alleged conduct, hails from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Texas. The defendants in that case, Ms. Craig, a doctor, and Mr. Faithful, the owner of the pain clinic where Craig worked, were indicted for running a pill mill in Houston, Texas.
Dr. Craig was accused of distributing 12,000 opioid prescriptions without a legitimate medical purpose, which translated to more than 2 million doses of the painkillers. Dr. Craig and Mr. Faithful are alleged to have hired armed security guards who told patients to turn off their cell phones before entering the pain-management clinic. Patients reputedly paid $300 up front for an appointment with Dr. Craig, although the visits were said to have typically lasted only a matter of minutes. Reference: United States v. Gazelle Craig, D.O. and Shane Faithful, Case No. 17-CR-00319 (S.D. of TX).
The second case comes from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Michigan, where six doctors were charged with operating a scheme in Michigan to prescribe patients with unnecessary opioids, among other conduct, allegedly resulting in an estimated $164 million in false claims. Reference: United States v. Mashiyat Rashid et al., Case No. 17-CR-20465-Hood (E.D. of MI).
Fraud in The Treatment of Opioid Addiction.
The third case is a by-product of the opioid epidemic and involves fraud in the treatment of individuals suffering from opioid addiction. The case comes out of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida and involves defendants Eric Snyder, the owner of an addiction-treatment facility and a “sober home”/drug-free residence for patients undergoing treatment, and his consultant, Christopher Fuller, who is described as a “junkie hunter.” Fuller is charged with illegally recruiting patients for Snyder’s treatment facility and sober home. Reference: United States v. Eric Snyder and Christopher Fuller, Case No. 17-MJ-8268-Brannon (S.D. of FL).
One of the alleged fraud schemes involved improper billing of routine urine drug screens, which are an essential part of any drug-treatment program because they gauge a patient’s opioid use and success in the rehab program. Mr. Snyder allegedly used the drug screens as a profit machine, double-billing for tests for the same patients at both the sober home and treatment facility and splitting samples to send them to different laboratories. To cover up this scheme, Snyder allegedly commingled urine samples to prevent identical test results.
Snyder and Fuller were also charged with a scheme in which they allegedly paid illegal kickbacks to get individuals suffering from opioid addiction to attend Snyder’s drug-treatment center. Some of the kickbacks involved giving free rent at the sober home, which cost $200 per week, and, shockingly, giving out drugs and/or alcohol to people suffering from addiction and thereby further feeding their addiction.
Together these fraud schemes are alleged to have resulted in an estimated $58 million worth of fraudulent medical insurance claims between 2011 and 2015.
It is a bummer when you get hoisted on the petard of intellectual inconsistency. Whether it is different medical professionals with different approaches to a
Picture this: You are driving through an area you don’t know well. It is a cold day. You stop to get gas. You fill the
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
