A Call to Order

A Call to Order

Inpatient admission orders don’t necessarily have to be written.

Last month, I participated in a webinar about the Two-Midnight Rule for the Association for Healthcare Denial and Appeal Management (AHDAM). The session generated several good questions. The most common question was, “wait, so you don’t need a written order for a patient to be considered an inpatient?” 

Hopefully, most of you have seen information from Ronald Hirsch, M.D. as he reported on the fact that in 2018, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) eliminated the need for a written order to justify inpatient admission. Now, to be clear, I am not saying that admission is always completely appropriate without any order. This is a good time to dive into some semantics and focus on why it is important to read and listen very carefully to each and every word when talking about Medicare regulations. 

The Two-Midnight Rule requires an order from a physician who has admitting privileges and is knowledgeable about the patient’s hospital course, medical plan of care, and current condition. There is a huge difference between the requirement for an “order” and a “written order.” An order can be oral, not written. As I have mentioned in the past, people often speak of verbal orders. I really would like to banish that phrase from our vocabulary. All orders are verbal, whether they are spoken, written, or transmitted via Morse code. “Verbal” means it is in the form of words. “Oral” means it is spoken aloud (I do not think you need me to tell you what “written” means!) So, the order can be oral, and it need not come from the physician who is primarily treating the patient. Any physician who has admitting privileges and is knowledgeable about the patient’s hospital course can issue the order. I do not see any reason that a utilization management (UM) physician would be barred from issuing the order, as long as that physician has taken the time to review the patient’s hospital course and plan of care. (Dr. Hirsch has pointed out some old guidance from CMS suggesting that they don’t believe that UM physicians may write the order. However, the plain language of the regulation would allow any physician with privileges and knowledge of the patient’s condition to do so.)

Now, I should emphasize that everything I just said applies solely to Medicare. It is entirely possible that in your state, your Medicaid program has different requirements. Private payors are entitled to have whatever conditions they wish to impose. But for Medicare, you do not need to have a written order. 

Another question related to situations in a post-COVID waiver world in which a patient is ready to leave the hospital for a skilled nursing facility (SNF), but no skilled nursing bed is available. In that situation, is it reasonable to admit the patient if they are going to be in for more than two midnights? I think this is a really good question, and I am interested in Dr. Hirsch’s thoughts. While preparing for that webinar, I learned that the Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) Manual, chapter 7, section 7005, states that Medicare pays for hospital days for patients awaiting placement until a swing bed is available. I think that language strongly suggests that admission is appropriate when a skilled nursing bed is unavailable, but I will not claim to be completely confident in that answer. 

Finally, let’s deal with a softball. If the patient is admitted as an inpatient but unexpectedly improves after one midnight and is discharged, is it still permissible to treat them as an inpatient? Absolutely. Admission status is determined by the expected course at the time of the admission decision. Unanticipated results, whether death or improvement, that alter the planned course of care do not change the validity of the original assessment. The only problem would be if the physician’s initial expectation of a two-midnight stay, based on the facts available at that time, was unreasonable.

The bottom line is that if you have an oral order, there is no need for you to get a new order. Nor is there a need to refund. Written orders are a good idea, but not a regulatory requirement.   

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

David M. Glaser, Esq.

David M. Glaser is a shareholder in Fredrikson & Byron's Health Law Group. David assists clinics, hospitals, and other health care entities negotiate the maze of healthcare regulations, providing advice about risk management, reimbursement, and business planning issues. He has considerable experience in healthcare regulation and litigation, including compliance, criminal and civil fraud investigations, and reimbursement disputes. David's goal is to explain the government's enforcement position, and to analyze whether this position is supported by the law or represents government overreaching. David is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is a popular guest on Monitor Mondays.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24