A recent survey has illustrated just how onerous the various federal regulations of healthcare have become.
If you’re feeling extra productive and accomplished this morning and want to bring yourself back to dismal reality, take a look at the regulatory dashboard on the website of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA).
The dashboard shows, in real time, the number of federal regulations in their last phase of review at the White House, getting ready for a stamp of approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) before being published in the Federal Register.
There are a total of about 100 federal regulatory agencies, but only about 15 agencies that we really hear about – and those are the agencies with representatives who sit on the president’s cabinet.
OIRA’s regulatory dashboard also gives a snapshot of the top 10 agencies that are putting out the most regulations at any given time.
Almost without fail, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has the most regulations that are about to be approved, and usually by a long shot.
Last night, for instance, because I needed something to go with my Chianti and my overall sense of angst, I visited OIRA’s regulatory dashboard and found that HHS has 30 regulations waiting to be published. That’s three times the number of regulations expected to come out of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the dashboard’s second-place winner. And HHS has more regulations in waiting than the bottom five finishers combined, including the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Labor, Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the Office of Personnel Management, and the Department of Energy.
To say that healthcare is the most regulated industry is an understatement.
A 2021 American Hospital Association (AHA) Study concluded that health systems, hospitals, and post-acute providers spend nearly $40 billion a year on activities related to regulatory compliance. That equates to an average cost of $1,200 per patient, or nearly $50,000 per hospital bed, per year.
Data from 2017 showed that health systems and hospitals must comply with 629 discrete regulatory requirements – and that was in 2017. Imagine what it is now, in the wake of the No Surprises Act and its transparency requirements.
Which brings us to last week, when the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) published the results of its annual survey on regulatory burden. Of the 500 group practices that were surveyed, nearly 9 in 10 reported that the regulatory load on their business had increased over the past year.
The biggest reported burdens this year were prior authorization and the surprise billing and good-faith estimate requirements. More than 80 percent indicated that obtaining prior authorization was very or extremely onerous, with 95 percent of respondents stating that patients had faced delays or denials for medical care because of prior authorization. More than 70 percent struggled with surprise billing and good-faith estimates.
Other findings from the MGMA survey include the following:
On the bright side, a whole 1 percent of the 500 surveyed thought that the regulatory burden had actually declined over the past 12 months.
I want to offer my humble apologies to anyone whose day I’ve ruined.
Programming note: Listen to the Monitor Mondays Legislative Update with Matthew Albright, sponsored by Zelis, Mondays on Monitor Mondays at 10 Est.
It finally happened! The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) finally released the 2026 Outpatient Prospective Payment Final Rule on Friday at 4:15 pm,
EDITOR’S NOTE: Ritesh Ramesh, CEO for MDaudit, appeared on Monitor Monday to report his company’s findings on nationwide audit trends. The rate of payer audits
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
