Hit and Miss: AMA Misses Opportunity to Simplify Hospital E&M Coding

AMA scores a hit with new guidelines; misses simplification of one subset of hospital E&M codes.

It was a happy day in 2020 the American Medical Association (AMA), the owner of the CPT® code set, announced a modification to the Evaluation and Management E&M coding guidelines for the office or outpatient visit code set (99201 – 99215) that became effective Jan. 1, 2021. Not only did they delete 99201, the low-level new patient visit code, which was rarely if ever used, but they also dramatically changed the rules for choosing a visit code, eliminating the need for a specific number of elements of the history, review of systems, and physical examination.

Instead of counting bullet points to meet a specific visit level, the new guidelines rely on either time or medical decision-making. Not one person would mourn the loss of the bloated progress note, full of superfluous information.

While there was elation in the physician office visit coding world, there was frustration expressed by hospital physicians at being left behind. For the time being, patient visits that took place in the hospital, either as inpatient or outpatient, and even in the emergency department, would still require use of the coding rules that date to the 1990s, including specific elements of history, including the all-important family history, especially important in octogenarians, asking about 10 body systems (for the dreaded Review of Systems) and examining the required number of body parts, regardless of the reason for the visit.  Yes, that meant if a urologist was called to evaluate a hospital patient with urinary retention, their examination of the head and neck would still need to be performed for some codes.

That frustration lasted “only” two years as the AMA announced in July 2022 that these same changes would extend to the hospital setting on January 1, 2023, including the emergency department and outpatients who are receiving observation services, basing code choice on either medical decision-making or time spent, with the emergency department visit codes limited to medical decision-making. The details of these coding guidelines, along with the other changes adopted, can be found in a summary from the AMA found here, or from numerous locations on the internet, such as this fantastic article by my friend Dr. Erica Remer from ICD10monitor.com.

Now here is where the AMA messed up. Throughout these new guidelines, they refer to the use of codes 99221-99223 for initial visits and 99231-99239 for subsequent visits and discharge day services for billing “Hospital Inpatient and Observation Care Services.” But there are an increasing number of patients who are hospitalized neither as inpatient nor as outpatient receiving observation services. The typical patient is the patient having an elective surgery scheduled as outpatient who spends a night (or two or three depending on their payer source) in the hospital for routine recovery. In these cases, the surgeon will usually consult either a hospitalist or specialist to manage the patient’s chronic medical illnesses during their stay.

Since these patients are receiving neither “Hospital Inpatient” nor “Observation Care Services,” the use of the code set 99221-99223 for initial visits and 99231-99239 for subsequent and discharge day services is not appropriate. So, what codes should be used? In email correspondence with the AMA staff, I was informed that, “Based on the information provided, the hospitalist E&M is correctly reported with the appropriate code from the E&M Office or Other Outpatient code series, 99202-99205, 99212-99215 based on whether the patient is a new or established patient, and the level of E&M service provided by the hospitalist.” That means instead of choosing from one of three codes for the first visit, 99221-99223, the physician will need to first determine if the patient is a new or established patient using the CPT guidelines and then depending on that, choose one of 4 visit levels (99202-99205 for new patients and 99212-99215 for established patients) using the E&M coding guidelines specific to office or other outpatient codes.

This is the opportunity the AMA missed. They could have specified the use of the 99221-99223 and 993231-99239 code set for “Hospital Inpatient, Outpatient and Observation Care Services” to standardize code choice for physicians. That would truly have simplified the code choice, eliminated the use of “office visit” codes in the hospital, and prioritized patients over paperwork.

The question that arises is what would happen if a hospitalist coded a visit of a hospital outpatient not receiving observation services with the Observation Care Services codes. In theory, the payer’s claim processing system would compare the professional fee charges to the facility fee charges, see no line-item charge for HCPCS G0378 and deny the physician claim. The frequency with which this actually happens is a mystery as I have yet to see a Medicare contractor report the results of an audit of “physician hospital visit accuracy based on place of service and appropriate code set.” I suspect the auditors have much bigger fish to fry. And as we all know, commercial payers will never share the target or the results of their audits.

Finally, it should be noted that in a very informal poll of coders who code office visits, many reported that the notes they review in 2022 continue to include elements that are no longer required such as the complete review of systems and a comprehensive examination just as they did prior to 2021, suggesting that many physicians remain unaware of the new coding rules. I would hope that prior to these rules for hospital visits taking effect on Jan. 1, 2023 every hospital will train all their physicians, from emergency medicine to hospitalists to specialists, on the new guidelines. I suspect that every single physician will rejoice in knowing they no longer have to ask questions or examine body parts that are completely irrelevant to the patient’s current medical care and would be able to spend more time actually providing patient care and documenting the elements that truly matter.

Programming note: Listen every Monday morning when Dr. Hirsch makes his Monday Rounds on Monitor Mondays 10 Eastern and sponsored by R1-RCM.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, ACPA-C, CHCQM, CHRI

Ronald Hirsch, MD, is vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at R1 Physician Advisory Services. Dr. Hirsch’s career in medicine includes many clinical leadership roles at healthcare organizations ranging from acute-care hospitals and home health agencies to long-term care facilities and group medical practices. In addition to serving as a medical director of case management and medical necessity reviewer throughout his career, Dr. Hirsch has delivered numerous peer lectures on case management best practices and is a published author on the topic. He is a member of the Advisory Board of the American College of Physician Advisors, and the National Association of Healthcare Revenue Integrity, a member of the American Case Management Association, and a Fellow of the American College of Physicians. Dr. Hirsch is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is regular panelist on Monitor Mondays. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, policies, or opinions of R1 RCM, Inc. or R1 Physician Advisory Services (R1 PAS).

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 19, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24