Learn How Exclusion of Zero-Paid Claims Works Against Providers: Part I

If overpayments are found, then the extrapolation recoupment number will go up; if underpayments are found, the extrapolation will go down.

EDITOR’S NOTE: This is Part I in a RACmonitor exclusive three-part series that exposes how some auditors can skew the universe of claims to their advantage by hiding zero-paid claims.

When claims are submitted for payment, some are paid, while some are not. Those claims submitted but not paid are known as “zero-paid claims.” Often, in a computer record of a provider, a zero-paid claim will have all of the customary information, such as patient name, identification number, the doctor’s name, the procedure billing code, the dates of service, and the value of the procedure. But instead of showing a payment received, the record will show a zero. The healthcare provider was paid nothing. Why is that? That’s not in the record.

When the statistical part of an audit takes place, the contractors have long ago fallen into the habit of screening out all of these zero-paid claims up front. They do this when they pull the claims from the master database of all claims submitted. This step in the statistical methodology is hidden from the provider, and only obliquely referred to. 

With these extracted claims, the auditor creates what it usually refers to as a “universe” file. These are the claims that will be the subject of the audit. But note, this list of claims is not the true universe. Instead, it is an extract of the actual universe, but with the zero-paid claims excluded. They are hidden from sight.

After this pseudo-universe file is created, the auditor then pretends this is when the statistical process begins. It proceeds to take the sample and analyze the claims.

The auditor starts to look for overpayments. These are claims that were paid, but should not have been. Each claim in the sample is subjected to the strictest possible interpretation of the rules. Here, the auditor has one single objective: finding something wrong with a claim so it can be rejected. Even the most minor of matters will be blown up into a full rejection of the claim. A simple typo can lead to tens of thousands of dollars in penalties. In 90 percent or more of the audits, claim rejections have nothing whatsoever to do with fraud. This is how the auditor will then come up with an outrageous extrapolation number.

Yet in Section 8.4.4.4. of the Medicare Program Integrity Manual, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) standard calls for identification of all underpayments – not only overpayments, but also underpayments. And in Section 8.4.5.2, it calls for the auditor to record underpayments as negative overpayments when performing the extrapolation.

What this means is that the Program Integrity Manual demands that the auditor look not only for overpayments, but also carefully look for any underpayments.

If overpayments are found, then the extrapolation recoupment number will go up; if underpayments are found, the extrapolation will go down.

But if the auditor is looking only for overpayments, then it means the extrapolation number can only go up – and against the provider. The recoupment demand can only grow larger, and the provider never will receive credit for claims that should have been paid, but were not. It is a one-way street, always going uphill against the provider, never downhill.

Where are those claims that should have been paid? What we find is that they are not there. They are hidden away, missing in action. When all zero-paid claims are screened out at the beginning of the audit, it forgoes the provider ever getting credit for a claim not paid that should have been. These claims are never even considered by the army of coders and evaluators. They are not even listed in the universe file.

A more accurate name for this so-called “universe” file provided by the auditor is “the file where all claims that might give you credit have been screened out.”

If the auditor was fair, then all submitted claims would be in the “universe” file from which the sample is taken. That is often not what happens.

This practice of hiding the zero-paid claims has gone on for years, and it needs to stop. 

Programming Note: Listen to the live reporting of Edward M. Roche this coming Monday on Monitor Mondays, 10 Eastern.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Edward M. Roche, PhD, JD

Edward Roche is the director of scientific intelligence for Barraclough NY, LLC. Mr. Roche is also a member of the California Bar. Prior to his career in health law, he served as the chief research officer of the Gartner Group, a leading ICT advisory firm. He was chief scientist of the Concours Group, both leading IT consulting and research organizations. Mr. Roche is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board as an investigative reporter and is a popular panelist on Monitor Mondays.

Related Stories

The OIG, ABN, IMM, and DND in the News

Let’s start with a recent (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General) OIG audit of a Medicare Advantage plan. Now these

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering OB GYN Coding Accuracy: Precision Coding for Compliance and Reimbursement

Gain clarity and confidence in OB‑GYN coding with this expert‑led webcast featuring Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS‑P, CPEDC, COPC. You’ll learn how to apply global maternity package rules accurately, select the right CPT codes for procedures and visits, and identify documentation gaps that lead to denials. With practical guidance and real examples, this session helps you strengthen compliance, reduce audit risk, and ensure accurate reimbursement for women’s health services.

May 14, 2026

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update Webcast Series

Uncover essential coding insights with nationally recognized coding authority Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS. Through ICD10monitor’s interactive, on‑demand webcast series, Kay walks you through the AHA’s 2026 ICD‑10‑CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics, translating each update into practical, easy‑to‑apply guidance designed to sharpen precision, ensure compliance, and strengthen day‑to‑day decision‑making. Available shortly after each official release.

April 13, 2026

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update: Fourth Quarter

Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.

December 14, 2026

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update: Third Quarter

Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s third quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.

October 12, 2026

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Compliance for the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility (IPF-PPS): Minimizing Federal Audit Findings by Strengthening Best Practices

Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.

April 9, 2026

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips

Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.

March 19, 2026

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

BLOOM INTO SAVINGS! Get 25% OFF during our spring sale through March 27. Use code SPRING26 at checkout to claim this offer.

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24