Important advice when dealing the media.
Because the federal government and health insurers are covering the cost of the COVID-19 vaccine and its administration, it is generally inappropriate for healthcare organizations to bill a patient receiving a vaccine. But mistakes happen.
A client of mine recently called in a panic, as they discovered they had inadvertently billed a number of patients for their vaccinations. Their experience offers some lessons. First, when it comes to big, high-profile billing issues, the types of things that might get you on TV, it can be worth taking the time to provide broad education to everyone in the billing department.
Choosing when to send a notice is challenging. There are innumerable billing issues, and if you are emphasizing everything, functionally, you aren’t emphasizing anything. But I do not think that anyone was terribly surprised that this particular error wound up garnering media coverage. Generally speaking, you are not going to be on TV for billing with the wrong site of service. But making a mistake on a national health priority is the sort of thing that generates news stories above the fold and teaser previews on television. When a mistake is likely to be high-profile, it can be worth a department-wide note to make sure everyone knows the rule.
Second, put real effort into training everyone who might interact directly with patients on strategies for ensuring that any patient who calls with a question about their bill both is, and feels, listened to. It is somewhat common for anyone, including customer service professionals, to get too committed to defending a position. When the first patients called with questions about the vaccine, they received pushback from the billing office. The patients had identified a problem, but their concerns were dismissed or minimized. Even when staff recognized an error, they assumed it was unique, and failed to encourage a broader review of other patients. Since the callers generally knew that they were right and the person they were speaking to was wrong, getting the pushback was extremely inflammatory. It is bad enough to get a bill that you know you aren’t supposed to receive, but then when the person you call to correct it chooses to argue with you, that can trigger the desire to call the local news station.
Which brings me to my final point. Whether you are talking to the patient or the local TV station or newspaper, what should you say? Many lawyers recommend avoiding all comments to the media, or offering a curt “no comment.” I strongly disagree with that strategy. In a situation where you know you’ve made a mistake, an apology is usually a wise strategy. Whether you are dealing with a frustrated patient or a concerned regulator, there is a very real possibility that that person’s main goal is to get a sense that you recognize the problem and are going to fix it.
While there are certainly some people who will want to exploit the error for financial gain, it is far more common to encounter someone who just wants to be treated with respect. An apology will often defuse what is otherwise an explosive situation. I am not suggesting talking with the media is risk-free, and you certainly want to avoid a situation in which you present something as factual unless you are 100 percent certain it is correct.
If you have insurance that may cover any liability, it may be worth confirming that the insurer won’t try to deny coverage because you have apologized. But in most situations, a well-crafted apology is a sound risk management strategy.
Programming Note: Listen to David Glaser’s “Risky Business” reports every Monday on Monitor Mondays, 10 Eastern.
Risk adjustment has entered a new era. We are no longer operating in a documentation optimization environment; we are operating in an enforcement and recalibration
EDITOR’S NOTE: Gloryanne Bryant has more than 40 years of experience in her field and is an independent HIM Coding and CDI Consultant who works
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
