News Alert: OIG Auditing of Post-Acute Transfer Claims Roils Hospitals

The OIG has instructed MACs to recoup the entire DRG payment on claims dating back to 2016.

EDITOR’S NOTE: The RACmonitor special bulletin of Jan. 30, “News Alert: Widespread Recoupments of Incorrect Post-Acute Transfer Claims Have Begun,” is prompting alarm among hospitals, as evidenced by the response from Dr. R. Phillip Baker.

In response to the directive issued by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG), in which the federal healthcare watchdog has instructed Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) to recoup the entire DRG payment on claims dating back to 2016, Dr. R. Phillip Baker, a physician advisor, is urging physicians to take immediate action.

“The recoupment is completely out of proportion to the error, as the normal finding would only result in the recoupment of the difference between the actual payment and what should have been paid with the correct code on the claim,” Baker said in an email to RACmonitor. “For the most part, the denial is correct, and an error occurred on the claim, so the standard appeal process would not help.”

The other issue, according to Baker, is that these claims are well beyond the time frame for filing a corrected claim, so there is no way to lessen the impact through that process.

“The letter (results of the OIG audit on disposition codes) issued does allow a rebuttal process, but you only have 15 days to use this option from the date of the letter,” Baker said. “I spoke with Dr. Toni Sculimbrene at Palmetto, GBA, who advised that the rebuttal process should be utilized, as the MAC has no other option for stopping the recoupment.” 

According to Baker, as stated in the letter, “a rebuttal is not intended to review supporting medical documentation, nor disagreement with the overpayment decision. A rebuttal shall not duplicate the redetermination process.” The rebuttal, he noted, is to address that the recoupment was not done using the correct methodology, as it should, but only addresses the part of the payment that was incorrect (rather than the entire payment).

“I have also reached out to the South Carolina Hospital Association, and encourage you to reach out to your state associations and the American Hospital Association (AHA) to encourage their involvement,” Baker said. “The more complaints issued about this unfair and inappropriate process, (the more it) will make the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the OIG have to take notice and address the issue. It is only by everyone filing these rebuttals that the process can change to be fair.”

Baker urged fellow physicians that if they have cases they find were inappropriately denied, then they also need to follow the redetermination process also addressed in the letter.

“You do not want to miss the time frames that apply to that as well,” Baker urged. “Even if this is the case, still, file the rebuttal about the issue of recouping the entire payment.”

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Chuck Buck

Chuck Buck is the publisher of RACmonitor and is the program host and executive producer of Monitor Monday.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24