Interim CMS Rule Changes Key Definition for Telehealth Billing Purposes

A key difference exists in the teaching physician rule.

As part of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS’s) attempt to permit professionals to provide care remotely, they’ve made changes to some supervision rules, including supervision of services that are incident to a physician’s work and the teaching physician rules.

Let’s start with the incident-to rules. I’ve always found the term confusing. It refers to services that are performed under the direction of a physician, but the Medicare statute calls them an “incidental part” of the physician’s work. The incident-to rule relies on the definition of “direct supervision” found in the diagnostic test rule, 42 CFR § 410.26. It says “a physician must be present in the office suite and immediately available to furnish direction throughout the performance of a procedure. It does not mean that the physician must be present in the room when the procedure is performed.” 

The new interim rule changes the definition of “present.” During the public health emergency, “the presence of the physician includes virtual presence through audio/video real-time communication technology when the use of such technology is indicated to reduce exposure risks for the beneficiary or healthcare provider.” The obvious question is whether the link must be open during the service. It seems quite clear that the answer is “no.” If the supervising physician is available, that should be sufficient. I will acknowledge that the regulation isn’t crystal clear. But if the physician had to watch the entire encounter live, that would be placing a higher supervision requirement during the emergency than existed previously. While it would have been clearer to explicitly state that the physician must be immediately available through audio/video real-time communication, that is the import of the change. The incident-to regulation has two requirements, “presence” and “immediate availability.” CMS is changing the definition of “presence,” while leaving “immediate availability” unchanged. Availability by smartphone is enough.

But the teaching physician rule is very different. Currently, the rule, found at 42 CFR § 415.172, requires that “if a resident participates in a service furnished in a teaching setting, the physician fee schedule payment is made only if the teaching physician is present during the key portion of any service or procedure for which payment is sought.” The new addition to the regulation says that if the teaching physician “is present during the key portion of the service using interactive telecommunications technology,” the presence requirement is met.  (The rule defines “interactive telecommunication” as “multimedia communications equipment that includes, at a minimum, audio and video equipment permitting two-way, real-time interactive communication between the patient and distant-site physician or practitioner.”) Under the teaching physician rule, availability is insufficient. A teaching physician has to be watching real-time on the interactive telecommunication during the key components. In essence, this will allow a teaching physician who is quarantined to supervise residents, but it will not allow residents and supervising physicians to run parallel rooms.

CMS is, however, expanding the so-called primary care exception. Historically, residents could only provide up to a Level 3 service in these primary care centers. During the crisis, CMS will allow the residents to provide Level 4 and 5 services as well.

I want to stress that the teaching physician rule doesn’t limit what residents can do; it only affects what can be billed. The resident can provide services without the supervising physician being present, but you can’t bill Medicare for it. In order to bill Medicare, the teaching physician must be present. You might be able to bill private payors (and even Medicaid, in many states) for a resident’s services. The Medicare restriction exists because Medicare pays for a resident’s time. Now, a physician can supervise from afar, but only if they are able to participate with a device that has audio and visual capability.

Programming Note: Healthcare attorney David Glaser is a permanent panelist on Monitor Mondays. Listen to his live reporting this coming Monday during a special 60-minute townhall edition of Monitor Mondays, 10 -11 a.m. EST.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

David M. Glaser, Esq.

David M. Glaser is a shareholder in Fredrikson & Byron's Health Law Group. David assists clinics, hospitals, and other health care entities negotiate the maze of healthcare regulations, providing advice about risk management, reimbursement, and business planning issues. He has considerable experience in healthcare regulation and litigation, including compliance, criminal and civil fraud investigations, and reimbursement disputes. David's goal is to explain the government's enforcement position, and to analyze whether this position is supported by the law or represents government overreaching. David is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is a popular guest on Monitor Mondays.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

I022426_SQUARE

Fracture Care Coding: Reduce Denials Through Accurate Coding, Sequencing, and Modifier Use

Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.

February 24, 2026
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24