Monitor Monday’s listeners polled for proposed solutions.
2020 began as it ended, with the healthcare industry fixation on every nook and cranny of the social determinants of health (SDoH). Many experts are still reeling from allegations of inherent bias in algorithms used across the nation. And a new study involving Medicare Hospital Compare is adding fuel to the bias fire.
The study, published in Medical Care, through the American Public Health Association, linked 2017 Medicare Hospital Compare ratings with block group data from the 2015 American Community Survey, which assesses hospital ratings as a function of neighborhood social risk factors. The goal of the study was to examine the relationship between the ratings and neighborhood social risks, but it revealed a larger industry challenge:
Study details:
- Number = 3,608 Medicare-certified hospitals across 50 states
- Measures included hospital summary scores and seven quality group scores (using a 100-percentile scale):
- Effectiveness of care
- Efficiency of care
- Hospital readmissions
- Mortality
- Patient experience
- Safety of care, and timeliness of care.
- Lower hospital summary scores were associated with caring for neighborhoods with higher social risk, including a reduction in hospital scores for every 10 percent of residents who:
- Are dually eligible for Medicare/Medicaid
- Have no high-school diploma
- Are unemployed
- Self-identified as black
- Reported high travel times to work
The associations between neighborhood social risk factors and hospital ratings were the smallest in the areas of safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of care groups. The areas with the largest associations were:
- Timeliness of care
- Patient experience
- Hospital readmissions
Could this be another situation of totally unintentional bias in a rating system? Just as safety-net hospitals are righting themselves after the inequity of initial readmission payment penalties, are they now poised for another financial hit? Medicare could be underpaying hospitals that serve communities most at risk for the social determinants, simply because of a skewed rating system; these are the hospitals that need the dollars the most. The outcomes gathered are only as good as the tools developed, and those tools must reflect appropriate measures and context. As an article about the study states, “failing to account for neighborhood social risk in hospital ratings may reinforce hidden disincentives to care for medically underserved areas in the United States.”
We asked our Monitor Mondays listeners in the first survey of 2020 about their choice of a mitigation plan for Medicare Hospital Compare. Here are the results:
{advpoll id=’113′ view_result=’1′ width=’0′ position=’center’}
Programming Note: Listen to Ellen Fink-Samnick’s live reporting on the State of the Union of SDoH on Monitor Monday, 10-10:30 a.m. EST.
