Since 2010, a total of 113 rural hospitals have closed in the U.S
Last week I was honored to be the opening keynote for SEACAA 2019; the annual conference for the Southeastern Association of Community Action Agencies. More than 1,000 of these agencies are on the front lines of the social determinants of health (SDoH), advocating for, coordinating, and partnering with populations in need to help ensure they receive necessary non-clinical services. They promote financial self-sufficiency through the following:
The agencies serving rural communities were front and center during the conference, as speakers emphasized the importance of recent studies focused on emergency department closures for these communities, as well as those in other areas impacted by the SDoH.
Rural Hospital Closures
Since 2010, a total of 113 rural hospitals have closed in the U.S., most of these in southern states. Another 430 hospitals are at risk. The ripple effect is unfathomable, leaving patients and their communities without appropriate acute care.
Some of you may have noticed a recent TV commercial. An ambulance crew tears into a hospital ED driveway with a critical patient onboard. They enter a dark, deserted ED space, with their next steps uncertain, although increased mortality risk to the patient is a given.
From 2013 to 2017, rural hospitals closed at nearly double the rate of the previous five years, casualties of decreased reimbursement, increased healthcare costs, and a series of other factors. Appropriate care is now often at least 20 miles away, if not further, in these communities. In sum:
One study conducted through the University of Washington examined 92 rural hospital closures in California. The most prominent impact was the increased morbidity and mortality rate for the populations served, as high as 5.9 percent, due to:
Impact of ED Closures and Openings on Bystander Facilities
Another study funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) provided quite concerning results. The national study was the first to evaluate the impact of ED openings and closures on bystander EDs, looking specifically at outcomes for heart attack patients.
Medicare data from between 2001 to 2013 was pulled that examined treatment and health outcomes for over 1 million patients across 3,720 hospitals; the data included facilities and persons in rural areas. All facilities were affected by the closure or opening of an ED. The primary health outcomes measured were after 30 and 90 days, plus one-year mortality rates. Thirty-day readmissions were also reviewed. Findings included:
The Impact on Women’s Health
Hospital and especially ED closures are impacting patient populations in all communities, particularly those individuals presenting with maternal health issues. The rate at which women die of pregnancy-related complications is 64 percent higher in rural areas compared to urban areas, and has been steadily rising. Over 700 women died within one year of giving birth, one study found,, double the maternal mortality rate of a decade ago. Increasing maternity deserts in cities have become an unhealthy norm.
Black women are disproportionately more likely to die during or after childbirth than white women, with three to four times the risk of mortality. Two wards of Washington, D.C, no longer have any hospitals with obstetric services. Pregnant women who live in these areas must travel as much as an hour or more for maternity care. When a woman has a high-risk pregnancy, or is at risk for premature birth, the outcomes can be often be fatal. More targeted funding, programs, and resources must be available to address these populations.
Programming Note: Follow this continuing story weekly on Monitor Mondays, 10-10:30 a.m. EST for the State of the Social Determinants report.
I am sure everyone agrees that not only is providing healthcare complicated, but so are all the administrative aspects of healthcare. And as a result,
Let me start this article by asking for your help. Flash back to 2013. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) at that time
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
This third session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review of FY26 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.
This second session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review the FY26 changes to ICD-10-PCS codes. This information will be presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
