The common thread appears to be physicians willing to take money as administrators.
As we recently reported, according to Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the U.S. Justice Department’s Criminal Division, “Philip Esformes orchestrated one of the largest healthcare fraud schemes in U.S. history, defrauding Medicare and Medicaid to the tune of over a billion dollars.”
Sadly, even if the amount of fraud in the Esformes case pans out as being accurate, it would barely make the top five fraud cases in the last 10 years. The fines levied against pharmaceutical giants like GlaxoSmithKline and its stunning $3 billion settlement in 2012 dwarf Mr. Benczkowski’s estimate. It is also very unlikely that regulators will recover more than pennies on the dollar on any of the fines that are finally assessed in the Esformes case.
One of the common threads in these cases is the fact that physicians were willing to take money in exchange for doing something other than caring for patients. Physicians were paid to prescribe drugs or refer patients to certain facilities in return for cash or other remuneration. Some of the physicians in kickback schemes like this are eventually charged. Many of them are not.
What is the answer to reducing kickbacks and fraud among doctors? First, you have to realize how easy it is to hide and rationalize kickback payments. The pharmaceutical industry often hires physicians to come to “speaking engagements” and pays large “speaking fees,” offering travel to exotic destinations. The physician thinks that this payment for services will appear normal to the outside world, even if someone does find out. “Anyway,” they think, “I am a brilliant physician, and I am really being paid what I am worth for speaking.”
In the case of Mr. Esformes, he was convicted in part for paying physicians as “administrators” in return for referring patients to his facilities. We can see physicians thinking that it is a common practice to pay them to provide administrative services to nursing homes, so who can prove that the payments were made in return for steering patients to the facility paying them?
In the 1950s, criminologist Donald R. Cressey came up with a hypothesis to explain why people commit fraud. The three key elements in the fraud triangle are an opportunity, perceived pressure, and rationalization.
In terms of the perceived pressure to make money, even for physicians and businesspeople like Mr. Esformes, who seem to have as much money as they could ever need, they seem compelled to commit fraud. I am reminded by a line from the movie Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps, the sequel to the landmark 1987 Oliver Stone film starring Michael Douglas as scheming insider trader Gordon Gekko.
Shia LaBeouf’s character asks James Brolin in the film, “everybody has an exact number – what is yours?”
James Brolin smiles smugly and replies, “more.”
A lawsuit filed last week by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) brought attention to a seldom-litigated allegation of fraud against the government: manipulation of
A new wave of Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs) and Unified Program Integrity Contractors (UPICs) have swept across the nation, empowered to root out fraud in
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
