30-Day Readmission Penalty Denials Scrapped by Medicare Managed Care

Hospitals may consider abandoning their contracts.

There are few things managed Medicare plans have come up with that are more unfair to hospitals than denials due to readmission. Hospitals with contracts with managed Medicare payers often must endure these denials, as they are not often excluded in contracts.

Managed Medicare companies cite the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) readmission policy as the basis for their denials. CMS instructs hospitals to combine for billing purposes when a patient is readmitted on the same calendar day for the same or a similar diagnosis. CMS also requests that hospitals combine admissions when premature readmission or quality-of-care issue leads to. Conversely, most managed Medicare payers deny all readmissions within 30 days of discharge.

Hospitals have been working to reduce readmissions for approximately six years. The main causes of readmissions are medication noncompliance and lack of timely physician follow-up. The seven-day readmission rate can be reduced by improving these two issues. Hospitals have provided resources to form readmission teams, which work hard to reduce readmissions. Readmissions after seven days generally are caused by chronically ill, elderly patients who need additional care.

However, even the best hospital performers have readmission rates of approximately 15 percent. Should managed care be permitted to deny 15 percent of their admissions to your organization? Some Medicare managed care payers consider of these denials if you can demonstrate readmission for patient noncompliance or lack of transition of care. But this seems to be the exception to the rule.

Last week I had an egregious readmission case. An elderly COPD patient was treated for respiratory failure. He was transferred to a subacute facility, where he had good physician follow-up and maintained excellent medication compliance. Ten days after hospital discharge, he to the emergency department in respiratory and was intubated and ventilated. It took two weeks in critical care for the patient to recover. The two-week admission, including his critical care days, denied due to the payer’s readmission policy. Is that fair? Is that reasonable?

Hospital contracting and finance must raise their voices regarding this practice. Alternatively, hospitals may consider abandoning their contracts, which forces Medicare managed care to adhere to CMS rules, which do not follow this practice.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Howard Stein

Dr. Howard Stein is the associate director of medical affairs and a physician advisor at Centrastate Medical Center in Freehold, N.J. He has been a full-time physician advisor for 13 years and a part-time physician advisor since 1993. He is a board-certified family physician who served as an assistant clinical professor of family medicine at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School in New Brunswick, N.J. and at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ) in Newark, N.J. He is board-certified by the American Board of Quality Assurance & Utilization Review Physicians. Dr. Stein is also an executive board member of the American College of Physician Advisors.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

I022426_SQUARE

Fracture Care Coding: Reduce Denials Through Accurate Coding, Sequencing, and Modifier Use

Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.

February 24, 2026
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24