TPE audits appear to be on the rise.
The old baseball adage, “three strikes and you’re out,” now has relevance in the Medicare audit arena. Targeted probe and educate (TPE) audits are the latest type of audits facing Medicare providers and suppliers. TPE audits are unique in that, unlike other Medicare audits, providers and suppliers may be subject to up to three rounds of record reviews. If the provider or supplier fails to improve the accuracy of their claims after three rounds, they will be referred to CMS for possible further action.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) initially launched TPE as a pilot program in one Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) jurisdiction limited to certain types of claims. In October 2017, CMS expanded TPE reviews to all MACs for all Medicare providers and suppliers and all items and services billed to Medicare. The focus of TPE audits are providers and suppliers with a history of high claim error rates or unusual billing practices compared to their peers, and items and services that have high national error rates and are a financial risk to Medicare. Common claim errors subject to TPE include: (1) the signature of the certifying physician was not included; (2) documentation does not meet medical necessity; (3) encounter notes did not support all elements of eligibility; and (4) missing or incomplete initial certifications or recertification.
Providers selected for a TPE audit will receive an initial notification letter or “Notice of Review” from the MAC. The Notice of Review will provide the reason the Medicare provider or supplier was chosen for a TPE audit, as well as a description of the TPE audit process. Once the TPE process is initiated, the provider or supplier may be subject to up to three rounds of record reviews, known as a “probe.”
Each probe consists of a review of between 20 to 40 claims and the supporting medical records. If the Medicare provider or supplier is deemed in compliance with the Medicare rules by the MAC following the first round, the provider or supplier will be removed from the TPE process and the MAC will not review the provider or supplier on the selected topic for at least one year absent significant billing changes. If the MAC detects claim errors during the first round, the MAC will issue a letter detailing the errors and will offer the provider or supplier a one-on-one education session with the MAC’s provider outreach and education staff. While the one-on-one education session is offered after the MAC’s review, providers and suppliers should be aware that they have the ability to communicate with the MAC during the review process.
Following the one-on-one education session, the provider or supplier will be given at least 45 days to improve their billing and documentation practices. After the expiration of the 45-day period, the MAC will initiate the second round by reviewing another 20 to 40 claims and supporting documentation. The MAC will issue a second results letter identifying any claim errors during the second probe. If the provider or supplier is deemed in compliance during this round, it will be removed from the TPE process and not subject to review for at least one year absent significant billing changes. If the MAC detects claim errors, it will again offer the provider or supplier an individualized education session.
Medicare providers and suppliers who continue to have a certain error rate will be subject to a third round. CMS has indicated that the error percentage will vary based on the service or item under review, but an important factor in determining whether a provider or supplier moves on to additional rounds is based upon improvement from round to round. If a provider or supplier fails to adequately improve its claim accuracy after three rounds, the MAC will refer the provider or supplier to CMS for additional action, including but not limited to, prepayment review, extrapolation of overpayment, referral to a Recovery Audit Contractor, or other disciplinary action.
TPE reviews and overpayment determinations may be appealed through the Medicare appeals process. Specifically, a provider or supplier may request redetermination of an overpayment determination. If an unfavorable redetermination decision is issued, the provider or supplier may request reconsideration by a Qualified Independent Contractor. If the reconsideration decision is unfavorable, the provider or supplier may present their case before an Administrative Law Judge. If the Administrative Law Judge’s decision is unfavorable, the provider or supplier can appeal to the Medicare Appeals Council, and then to a federal district court.
Given the potential consequences of a TPE audit, it is critical that Medicare suppliers and providers be proactive about ensuring compliance with Medicare billing and documentation requirements to reduce the risk of being selected for a TPE audit. If a provider or supplier is selected for a TPE audit, it should timely submit the requested records and communicate with the MAC throughout the TPE process to address and resolve any claim errors.
We have been talking a lot lately about the malfeasance of Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, and deservedly so. But malfeasance can be a two-way street.
While President-elect Trump’s pick for U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., put the agency in even international newspapers
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.
Optimize your outpatient clinical documentation and gain comprehensive knowledge from foundational practices to advanced technologies, ensuring improved patient care and organizational and financial success. This webcast bundle provides a holistic approach to outpatient CDI, empowering you to implement best practices from the ground up and leverage advanced strategies for superior results. You will gain actionable insights to improve documentation quality, patient care, compliance, and financial outcomes.
Enhancing outpatient clinical documentation is crucial for maintaining accuracy, compliance, and proper reimbursement in today’s complex healthcare environment. This webcast, presented by industry expert Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, will provide you with actionable strategies to tackle complex challenges in outpatient documentation. You’ll learn how to craft detailed clinical narratives, utilize advanced EHR features, and implement accurate risk adjustment and HCC coding. The session also covers essential regulatory updates to keep your documentation practices compliant. Join us to gain the tools you need to improve documentation quality, support better patient care, and ensure financial integrity.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Healthcare organizations face complex regulatory requirements under the No Surprises Act and Price Transparency rules. These policies mandate extensive fee disclosures across settings, and confusion is widespread—many hospitals remain unaware they must post every contracted rate. Non-compliance could lead to costly penalties, financial loss, and legal risks. Join David M. Glaser Esq. as he shows you how to navigate these regulations effectively.
Protect your facility from unwanted audits! Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, and take a deep dive into both the CMS and AMA guidelines for reporting post operative pain blocks. You’ll learn how to determine if the nerve block is separately codable with real life examples for better understanding. Becky will also cover how to evaluate whether documentation supports medical necessity, offer recommendations for stronger documentation practices, and provide guidance on educating providers about documentation requirements. She’ll include a discussion of appropriate modifier and diagnosis coding assignment so that you can be confident that your billing of post operative pain blocks is fully supported and compliant.
During this RACmonitor webcast Dr. Ronald Hirsch spotlights the areas of the OIG’s Work Plan and the findings of their most recent audits that impact utilization review, case management, and audit staff. He also provides his common-sense interpretation of the prevailing regulations related to those target issues. You’ll walk away better equipped with strategies to put in place immediately to reduce your risk of paybacks, increased scrutiny, and criminal penalties.
Copyright © 2024 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
