What’s in a Name? Warning: You Could Be at Risk

So, you want to be a doctor? No problem. Four years of undergrad, a decent score on your MCATs, four years of med school, residency, an internship – and that’s if you don’t choose to be a specialist. Now you want to go into the real world and pay off your quarter-million in student loans? But wait, there’s more! 

First, you have to get your NPI, or National Provider Identification number. To do this, you will fill out the NPI Application/Update Form (CMS-10114). In section 3.D., you will be asked to provide your taxonomy or specialty codes, and you can list up to four, with the primary specialty listed first. Once assigned, this information is stored in the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System, or NPPES, database.

Then you have to go through another process with another application so you can be credentialed specifically for Medicare. This is called PECOS, or the Provider Enrolled Chain and Ownership System. Of course, as you probably know, you have another form that needs to be filled out. This is Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) form 855, and it can have a suffix of A, B, I, R, O, S, or POH, depending on whether you are an individual, clinic, organization, etc. For form 855I, which is for individual physicians and non-physician practitioners, under section 2.D.1, you will be asked to designate your primary and secondary specialty from a list of dozens, without any restriction as to how many boxes you can check.

Assuming that you now have your NPI number and have been credentialed for Medicare, you can start billing payers for services you provide to your patients. But let’s say that you want hospital privileges so you can treat your patients in a hospital. Now, you will have to apply again and go through another review process. And once again, in many of the applications, you will be asked to provide your primary and sometimes secondary specialty, if applicable. 

Congrats! Now, what is your specialty? Well, the practice sees you as some given specialty, and the hospital gave you privileges with some specialty designation, and your NPI number is associated to some specialty, and under the PECOS system you are identified as some specialty, but the question is, are any or all of those correct, and do any of them match? The answer is, not always. In fact, in a study of over 15,000 physicians we conducted, we found that some 5 percent of respondents reported inconsistencies between the specialty they claimed and the specialties identified in the NPI and PECOS databases. In some cases, there wasn’t a match between any of them.

So, why is this a problem? Well, from a compliance perspective, it’s because so much of compliance risk assessment is dependent on peer-based benchmarking. Even the fraud prevention system, with its advanced statistical and predictive analytics techniques, depends on stratifying data by specialty. For example, the Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) study conducts analyses by specialty. 

More specifically, it identifies average error rates by specialty and then breaks down reasons for those errors, also by specialty. For example, table I reports improper payments by provider type for each claim type.  

So if you are benchmarking yourself as an internal medicine physician against other internal medicine physicians but you are really a cardiologist or gastroenterologist, then your numbers are going to be wrong, and so will be your risk assessments. 

The bottom line? Get it fixed. Check the NPPES and the PECOS databases and make sure that they not only match, but that they list your correct specialty.

And that’s the world according to Frank.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Frank Cohen, MPA

Frank D. Cohen is Senior Director of Analytics and Business Intelligence at VMG Health, LLC, and is Chief Statistician for Advanced Healthcare Analytics. He has served as a testifying expert witness in more than 300 healthcare compliance litigation matters spanning nearly five decades in computational statistics and predictive analytics.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24