Comfort care is not an indication to stop documenting and coding.
Last week, a listener reached out to me to ask me my opinion on querying for potential comorbid conditions or complications in relation to patients who expire. Specifically, she pinpointed patients who were transitioned to comfort care and asked whether it was fishing for CC/MCCs to query for end-of-life diagnoses, especially in the context of withholding active treatment.
When I was a physician advisor, I spent a large chunk of my weekly time in mortality reviews and giving providers feedback on documentation opportunities. My philosophy was that the coding abstract should be able to be reconstituted into a story if you translate the codes back into conditions. A provider’s job is to truthfully tell the story of the encounter, and the coder’s job is to accurately convert the verbiage into ICD-10 codes. I found it exceedingly annoying when I got to the end of an encounter and was left wondering, “Why did this patient die?!”
Comfort care encompasses both hospice and palliative care. Hospice is a specific subsegment of comfort care without curative intent, usually in patients with a limited (e.g., < 6 months) life expectancy. Palliative care can be provided at any time in the course of a serious, usually chronic, illness, and there may or may not be curative intent of treatment. Mortality reviews usually only exclude patients who are formal hospice patients. There may be further guidelines, such as the patient must be covered by hospice insurance and be in for symptom control only. This may vary between mortality models, but I am only intimately familiar with the one my organization utilized.
During my research for this segment, I discovered that the preferred term is “intensive comfort measures,” and this resonates with me. That term feels more active, as though you are choosing a positive treatment, rather than withholding or declining treatments in the negative. There are many symptoms which are addressed with intensive comfort measures, including pain, dyspnea, nausea and vomiting, constipation, cough, and dry mouth.
The discussion and decision to defer, withhold, or decline medical treatment is a very labor-intensive activity. It used to take me much longer to educate a patient as to why they did not need an antibiotic for their viral upper respiratory infection than it would to just scribble out a prescription. If a coder or CDIS is assessing whether something is a legitimate secondary diagnosis, the fact that treatment is not ultimately being undertaken should not prevent them from capturing the condition. In the Evaluation & Management universe, a decision not to resuscitate or to deescalate care because of poor prognosis is a criterion for high risk of morbidity from additional diagnostic testing or treatment, justifying the highest level of service in an office or ambulatory services setting.
If a patient expires, the diagnosis of the terminal cardiac arrest is implicit in the disposition. If a patient were to sustain a cardiac arrest, were to be resuscitated and linger for a week before finally succumbing, that cardiac arrest would be captured. Even though cardiac arrest (also ventricular fibrillation, respiratory arrest, certain types of shock) is only an MCC if the patient is discharged alive, its capture helps tells the story in codes.
If a patient transitions through stages of active dying proximate to expiration, I would not recommend capturing those (e.g., suffering an acute respiratory arrest leading to death within minutes in a patient who is Do-Not-Intubate, Do-Not-Resuscitate). That is inherent to the act of dying. However, if a patient lapses into a coma and survives for three days prior to expiring, that is a condition which should be recorded and captured.
There are a few reasons which I think support querying for significant conditions.
As always, the provider should be given enough information and clinical indicators to make a good decision as to whether a condition was present or not. The query should be compliant and non-leading. The fact that the mortality metrics will be affected should not be offered.
In conclusion, my opinion is that being deemed comfort care is not an indication to stop documenting and coding. After all, DNR does not stand for “Do Not Record.”
Programming Note: Listen to Dr. Erica Remer when she co-hosts Talk Ten Tuesdays with Chuck Buck, Tuesdays at 10 Eastern.
NGS needs to retract its wildly inaccurate instructions about split and shared visits. A client recently reached out to me trying to understand whether it
From think tanks to federal agencies, health policy in the U.S. is often shaped by voices we don’t always see in the headlines. Abe Sutton,
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
This third session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review of FY26 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
