Modern Healthcare reported that UnitedHealthcare (UHC) says that starting Jan. 1, it will only pay for remote patient monitoring for heart failure or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
Apparently, this was published in a September update to physicians, but I just learned of it thanks to the Nov. 10 Modern Healthcare article. The bulletin asserts that for conditions like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, and hypertension that are unrelated to pregnancy, remote monitoring is unproven, and not medically necessary. As a result, UHC will not cover it.
I have read the bulletin, and I will admit that I am a bit confused about exactly what UHC’s current position is with respect to the scope of patients to which the new policy will apply. The original reporting I saw indicated that this policy would apply to all patients insured by UHC, including Medicare Advantage (MA) patients. I am pretty certain that I saw a news story featuring a comment from UHC that the new policy was legal, but I can’t find that article now.
There are two reasons I want to mention this policy. The first is that this is a big deal. Remote monitoring is widely used. This change will affect patients and healthcare organizations. The second reason is that I don’t think there is a plausible argument that an MA plan can refuse to cover remote monitoring. I feel a little guilty covering this again, because we’ve seen many stories on the topic, but since it appears that major MA plans struggle to grasp the fact that MA plans have to cover everything that traditional Medicare covers, it bears repeating.
There is a federal regulation, 42 CFR § 422.101, that says with a few very limited exceptions that apply to some hospital care and hospice, every MA organization has to provide coverage by furnishing, arranging for, or making payment for “all services that are covered by Part A and Part B of Medicare and that are available to beneficiaries residing in the plan’s service area.” The regulation goes on to state that plans must comply with general coverage and benefit conditions included in traditional Medicare, unless superseded by laws applicable to MA plans.
The language is straightforward and clear. If traditional Medicare covers a service, MA plans must cover it as well. Traditional Medicare covers remote patient monitoring, so I am at a complete loss as to how UHC could think that they can apply this policy to their MA enrollees. But it appears that UHC may already recognize this reality.
The online version of the UHC policy has three different headings: one for commercial plans, one for individual exchange policies, and one for Medicare Advantage. When I click on the MA policy, I get a “404 page not found” error. It’s possible that someone within UHC recognized this relatively clear violation of MA regulations, and the company will only apply the policy on the commercial side. Ideally, there would be a direct statement on the website making this point, rather than a 404 error. But I suspect that is what is going on.
The bottom line is that while MA plans can be more generous than Medicare, under the law, they don’t have the ability to unilaterally limit coverage of service covered by traditional Medicare. Any limit on remote patient monitoring should not apply to MA patients unless Medicare adopts a limitation.
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.
Federal officials announced this week that one of the nation’s largest health insurers has agreed to pay $117.7 million to resolve fraud allegations. The False
It is a bummer when you get hoisted on the petard of intellectual inconsistency. Whether it is different medical professionals with different approaches to a
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
