I’m working on a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) audit wherein the question invites the reviewer to disregard Medicare regulations.
The question reads:
“Does the documentation support inpatient admission and level of care? (InterQual Level of Care Criteria) [failure to comply with InterQual Level of Care Criteria will not be treated as an error, but will be noted and explained in the RRL.”
There is so much to pick apart here. First, I am surprised that the OIG has a question that refers to an “inpatient level of care.” Ron Hirsch (Dr. Ronald Hirsch) and I have written at length about the fact that Medicare admission status is determined by the Two-Midnight Rule.
Under the Two-Midnight Rule, an outpatient is defined as a patient who needs hospital care and is expected to need it for fewer than two midnights. An inpatient is a patient who needs hospital care and is expected to need it for more than two midnights.
Both outpatients and inpatients require hospital care. There is no distinction between the “level of care” needed for an outpatient and an inpatient. I will emphasize this. The amount of care needed by a hospital outpatient can be more, less, or the same than the amount of care needed by a hospital inpatient.
Medicare has determined that the distinction between an inpatient and an outpatient is temporal, not based on the patient’s medical needs. The OIG form should not make any inquiry into the “level of care,” except to the extent the question is “did this patient require hospital care?”
My second concern with the question is the reference to InterQual. To be fair to the OIG, they explicitly said in the form that InterQual would not be used as criteria to determine an error. It will be used in the “RRL,” whatever the heck that is.
If the OIG wants to look at InterQual, they have as much right as the next person to do so. It is a problem only if someone asserts that InterQual determines a patient’s status. But by including it in the question, it invites the reviewer to focus on InterQual, and in a case I am working on, the reviewer did just that.
Services were denied because “the InterQual criteria for the inpatient admission and level of care were not met based on the surgical procedure performed.” Now, what makes this particularly interesting is that the inpatient case in question involved a total knee arthroplasty.
The patients in question were to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility (SNF). In a Monitor Monday segment a few weeks ago, I talked about how days awaiting placement in an SNF counts towards the Two-Midnight Rule. But it’s nice to have really knowledgeable co panelists, because (Dr.) Ron Hirsch taught me something even more important. The 2018 Outpatient Prospective Payment System Final Rule says that:
“We agree that the physician should take the beneficiaries’ need for post-surgical services into account when selecting the site of care to perform the surgery. We would expect that Medicare beneficiaries who are selected for outpatient TKA would be less medically complex cases with few comorbidities and would not be expected to require SNF care following surgery.” 82 FR 52356,52524, https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2017-23932/p-2018, bolding and underlining added.
The reviewer was clearly unaware of this. Hopefully, the OIG will recognize the error in the review and retract it. If you find yourself under OIG scrutiny, this is something to watch.
There is a lot of talk lately about the need to follow orders given by a member of law enforcement. I would like to explore
Remember the backlog at the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) level of review? Where providers routinely waited years for hearings, while recoupments proceeded and cash flow
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
