Normally, I write about substantive law, but today I’m going to focus more on psychology. The idea was triggered by the subject line in an email from the National Alliance of Medical Auditing Specialists (NAMAS) that read “I’ve never heard that before.” The included article focused on physicians resistant to education from coders, because no one had previously criticized their documentation.
That subject line triggered a memory for me. Way back in the 1990s, I was lucky enough to give a presentation at the Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA). It was my first time speaking at the HCCA. When the evaluations arrived, I read them eagerly.
The results were fascinating. While speaker evaluations seem to typically skew towards the good, rather than following a normal distribution, there is still usually a mix of all scores. But these evaluations were downright bimodal. Each was either a one for awful or five for excellent, with essentially nothing in between.
But what was more interesting was that whether the attendee loved or hated the speech, their comments were identical – both to one another and the subject line from the NAMAS email.
They all said, “I’ve never heard this before.” To make sense of it, you have to add a voice incantation that isn’t possible with the written word. The people who hated the speech wrote “I’ve never heard this before” with a tone of contempt that was almost audible coming from the page. The people who enjoyed the speech wrote “I’ve never heard this before” with the glee of discovery. The same words, but with a very different perspective.
There is a very important lesson here about human psychology that has important implications for compliance. Some people find novelty and new ideas intriguing, while others find them suspect, if not abhorrent. Similarly, some people are open to challenging their preconceived notions, and some are much less so.
This really matters. How effectively can you conduct an investigation if you’re not open to new ideas, and you can’t seriously entertain the possibility that your assumptions are wrong?
If change is threatening to someone, can they effectively evaluate whether a longstanding practice is actually improper, or will they assume that its historical standing is proof of its validity? The ability to weigh new information without bias, either in favor or against, is essential, but it is not universal.
I have not yet figured out the perfect way to interview compliance candidates and separate those with an open mind from those who anchor to their first impressions, but I’ve tried to ask questions about situations in which the candidate changed their mind. You can also ask the candidate for examples of how they think conventional wisdom is wrong.
I think if you want to have the best compliance team possible, you want to find friendly skeptics. You want people with an open mind who will question everything, but do it respectfully. You do not want to be in a situation where you’re channeling Bob Mould, originally from Husker Du, but the lead of Sugar when he sang “if I can’t change your mind then no one will.”
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.
For nearly a decade after the late-2000s Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) policy changes, work Relative Value Units (RVUs) felt like a stable
Hospitals across the country are facing mounting financial pressure from Medicare Advantage (MA) plans. One increasingly common tactic used by MA payers is systematic downcoding:
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
