Codes and Questions Linger: Q1 Coding Clinic

Codes and Questions Linger: Q1 Coding Clinic

Here are my thoughts on Coding Clinic, First Quarter, 2023:

  • As of April 1, 2023, there are going to be codes for financial abuse, suspected and confirmed, for adult and children, in T74 and T76. I’m glad that there are suspected codes, because it seems like it may be challenging for healthcare providers to make definitive determinations. The legal system may need to be involved to confirm this. Along those lines, I think that the expansion of perpetrator of maltreatment and neglect should have alleged in their titles. Unless I witness maltreatment and neglect in front of me in the emergency department, I am not sure it is my place to declare who is perpetrating anything.
  • The new code, Z55.6, Problems related to health literacy may be useful to provide clarity as to why a patient is not being compliant with instructions. Along those lines, subcategory Z91.1-, Patient’s other noncompliance with medication regimen or with renal dialysis is expanding to specify due to financial hardship or for other reason.
  • The announcement of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency ending reminds us that Z11.52, Encounter for screening for COVID-19 will again be fair game for coding. Remember that screening is only done in asymptomatic patients and would not be appropriate if there was known or suspected exposure to COVID-19. You would continue to use Z20.822, Contact with and (suspected) exposure to COVID-19 in those circumstances.
  • The first two questions were variations on a theme of acute blood loss anemia due to gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) with endoscopy and blood transfusion. The issue was determining which condition would be principal diagnosis (PDx). It seems a little confusing because the scenarios are quite similar. In the first case, Coding Clinic stated that since both the anemia and the GIB were present on admission and met the definition of PDx, either could be selected. The acute gastric ulcer found on EGD was non-bleeding and did not have active treatment.

In the second situation, the only difference seemed to be that the lesions found on endoscopy were bleeding and cauterized. Coding Clinic said “the primary focus of the admission was to diagnose and treat the bleeding conditions” which “were responsible for the anemia,” so one of the bleeding conditions should be selected, and they discounted the anemia as a potential PDx. I don’t disagree with choosing one of the bleeding conditions, but I think it is because the procedures done were therapeutic (as opposed to diagnostic EGD without source being identified). One would presume that both cases had anemia of similar and sufficient magnitude justifying admission and transfusions.

  • A question (p. 17) was asked regarding a nephrologist documenting CKD G4A3. The response explains that there is a “new categorization” system of chronic kidney disease staging called CGA staging which refers to C, cause, G, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and A, albuminuria. G4 indicates stage 4 CKD, so N18.4 can be picked up for that verbiage. This system isn’t really new; it has been around since at least 2012 and is found in the 2012 KDIGO practice guidelines for CKD.
  • There is a question on page 24 regarding how to code documentation of “liver mass possibly hepatic cholangiocarcinoma, pending pathology.” This invokes the uncertain diagnosis guideline and is an opportunity to educate the physician that the patient will be effectively diagnosed as having the malignancy, eliminating the need for a post-discharge pathology query if positive. If the pathology were to be surprisingly negative, a retrospective query would be necessary for the provider to remove the diagnosis.
  • The alphabetic index needs to be edited if the advice regarding acute pulmonary edema in the context of near drowning is to be heeded, and I support that. Edema à lung à due to near drowning currently indexes to T75.1, but the question on page 25 asks about this scenario and Coding Clinic advises using J81.0, Acute pulmonary edema with W67.XXXA, Accidental drowning and submersion while in swimming pool, initial encounter.

As usual, my best advice is to read the Coding Clinic yourself.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Erica Remer, MD, FACEP, CCDS, ACPA-C

Erica Remer, MD, FACEP, CCDS, ACPA-C has a unique perspective as a practicing emergency physician for 25 years, with extensive coding, CDI, and ICD-10 expertise. As physician advisor for University Hospitals Health System in Cleveland, Ohio for four years, she trained 2,700 providers in ICD-10, closed hundreds of queries, fought numerous DRG clinical determination and medical necessity denials, and educated CDI specialists and healthcare providers with engaging, case-based presentations. She transitioned to independent consulting in July 2016. Dr. Remer is a member of the ICD10monitor editorial board and is the co-host on the popular Talk Ten Tuesdays weekly, live Internet radio broadcasts.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Sepsis Sequencing in Focus: From Documentation to Defensible Coding

Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.

March 26, 2026
I022426_SQUARE

Fracture Care Coding: Reduce Denials Through Accurate Coding, Sequencing, and Modifier Use

Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.

February 24, 2026
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips

Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.

March 19, 2026

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24