Late last month, we saw a news report about the 340B drug pricing program. The association I lead represents more than 1,600 hospitals and health systems that participate in 340B. They are among the safety-net providers that receive mandated discounts from drug companies on certain outpatient drugs. They invest these savings into providing more care and treating more patients in need.
U.S. Sen. Bill Cassidy, a Republican from Louisiana who is also a well-respected physician, chairs the influential Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, which has jurisdiction over 340B. Over the past decade, he has raised various questions and concerns about hospital use of 340B. In November 2023, he began a 340B investigation, beginning with two 340B hospitals and later adding two health center networks, two national pharmacy chains, and two drug companies. Late last month, he released a report with findings from this multi-year investigation.
The report makes clear that a key interest of Senator Cassidy’s is to understand how the program supports care for vulnerable patients, a laudable goal that I think everyone supports. For that reason, my organization continually conducts research in that area, recently releasing two reports demonstrating that 340B hospitals treat more patients from low-income ZIP codes and provide more care for which they are unreimbursed or under-reimbursed than other hospitals.
As we review this new report, one of our key concerns is the suggestion that 340B savings should be used to provide direct savings for patients. As noted by our research, 340B hospitals use a significant share of their 340B savings to subsidize direct patient care. But they also use their savings to invest in new services and clinics that are needed in their communities. 340B plays a critical role in allowing hospitals to invest resources to meet these needs.
Here’s an example of the need for 340B to be used for investments in services. One of our member hospitals is located in a rural area that had almost no access to lifesaving mental health care. These services are often underpaid by Medicaid and other government insurers that make up a significant share of 340B hospital payors. That hospital used some of its 340B savings to develop and operate a behavioral health clinic to fill the gap and to sustain that care amid underpayments from payors. For that community, this investment produces significant patient care benefit that would not be possible if the hospital were forced to use 340B only to offer discounted drugs or subsidize existing services.
This is an example of precisely how Congress intended 340B to work. When they approved the statute, lawmakers specifically stated that a key goal was to reduce providers’ costs of operations. That only works when those providers can invest savings into capital improvements, specialized services, and community benefits based on specific patient care needs in their area.
Sen. Cassidy has made clear his interest in working with 340B providers, and I expect that he will hold hearings on 340B later this year. I’m happy to note that 340B continues to have strong bipartisan support from members of Congress, in large part because it is working well.
We remain committed to working with Sen. Cassidy and all of Congress to demonstrate that we must protect 340B so it continues to deliver value to underserved patients.
Here are my thoughts on what to expect when the federal shutdown finally ends. First, the lights don’t all flick back on at once. Agencies
As this year’s federal government shutdown is crowned the longest in history, we’re finally seeing progress towards a reopening. This weekend the Senate voted 60-40
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
