Since we are a few days into 2024, and every Medicare patient’s yearly deductible resets, it is an opportune time to review a few payment facts. Remember though that it is not the job of case management to counsel patients on their financial obligations; hopefully, you have financial counselors who can do that. But understanding the costs can often help in your discussions with patients about their admission status when they tell you that “AARP says to insist on being admitted as inpatient.”
The Medicare Part A deductible goes up to $1,632, an increase of $32, less than the $44 increase seen for 2023. The Part A deductible is due for every spell of illness, which is defined as the period which starts with an inpatient admission to a hospital or skilled nursing facility (SNF) under Part A and ends when the patient has not received any Part A services for 60 consecutive days. That means a patient could owe multiple Part A deductibles in one calendar year.
The Medicare Part B deductible goes up to $240, an increase of $14. From 2022 to 2023 there was a $7 decrease due to the mistaken projections on spending for medications for Alzheimer’s disease. The Part B deductible is due once per calendar year, applicable to the first services that submit claim(s) for Part B services.
The base observation payment (C-APC 8011) to hospitals for 2024 is $2,610.71. This is a $171.69 increase. This percentage increase is much higher than many other payment rate increases in 2024, again reflecting the hard work associated for accurately reporting costs.
Remember that each hospital’s actual payment is adjusted for their hospital wage index so the actual payment may vary. Also remember that observation stays are paid as a “mini-DRG” with a single, fixed payment that covers all services provided during the hospital stay, with some (inexplicable) exceptions imposed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). In the distant past, observation stays were paid on a per-service basis, generating very large bills.
So, how do you use these numbers?
The Medicare patient being placed outpatient with observation services in January who has no procedures during their stay and has Medicare A and B and no supplement and has not paid their Part B deductible will owe $714.14 for their observation stay (for the mathematicians, that is the Part B deductible of $240 plus the 20 percent co-insurance of $474.14.) If they are admitted as inpatient, they owe $1,632. Look, observation costs less than inpatient!
Now once that patient pays their yearly Part B deductible, any future observation stays in 2024 will cost the patient $522.14 and an inpatient admission would cost them $1,632. So, observation is even less costly than inpatient.
Now what about if they were recently an inpatient in the last 60 days and paid their Part A deductible? Well, then if placed in observation it would cost $522.14 but if admitted as inpatient it would be $0 so inpatient would cost them less. Finally, AARP can proudly say they are right.
But if you are choosing a patient status based on how much it would cost the patient or what the patient requests rather than following the regulations, please do not do it. We must all follow the rules regardless of the financial implications for the patient.
Now what if the patient has a Medigap supplement (as do well over 80 percent of patients with Parts A and B) or a Medicare Advantage (MA) plan or a commercial plan or a marketplace plan or Medicaid? Well then forget about figuring out their out-of-pocket costs. It’s impossible with way too many variables. Just put them in the right status and the numbers will fall where they do.
Now what is the right status? Well, 2024 brings some sanity with MA plans having to follow the Two-Midnight Rule but the subjectivity of a two-midnight expectation will remain along with many other issues that are beyond the scope of this discussion.
Listen to Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he makes his Monday rounds on Monitor Monday with Chuck Buck, 10 Eastern.
EDITOR’S NOTE: The author of this article used AI-assisted tools in its composition, but all content, analysis, and conclusions were based on the author’s professional
While the coverage of telehealth is definitely a good thing, it has caused needless confusion. I would like to address a little of that today.
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
