The last week has been a roller-coaster ride for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) No Surprises Act (NSA) policies and processes. But roller-coaster rides for CMS’s implementation of the No Surprises Act have become the norm.
A little over a week ago, CMS put up a “closed” sign on its beleaguered Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) process, and subsequently announced that they were pausing all IDR activities. The IDR process, just as a quick reminder, is the mediation process out-of-network providers can use if they want to argue against the reimbursement amount they received for claims that fall under the No Surprises Act.
At the time of last week’s closing, the IDR process was already extremely backlogged, with IDR entities still making their way through claims from last year.
CMS said they were pausing the process to give themselves time to digest a U.S. District Court ruling made the week before.
In essence, the Court made two significant decisions. First, the judge discarded a 600-percent increase in fees that CMS had implemented last year for the IDR. The result, for the time being, is that the fee reverts back to the original $50. Second, the judgment also threw out language in the CMS Final Rule governing the federal IDR process, which holds that batching can only be used for the same or similar items and services. The Texas Medical Association (TMA) had argued that batching should also be allowed for items and services that are provided to the same patient during the same encounter.
A day after the CMS announcement that all IDR activities had been stopped, CMS announced that it was switching gears and allowing the IDR process to start back up again for at least some NSA claims – specifically, claims for which the fee had already been paid.
In the meantime, CMS says it will continue to digest the Court’s decision, and the agency promised that it would be forthcoming with guidance on how it will proceed.
An interesting element in all this is that the judge did not throw out the administrative fee increase and CMS’s policy on batching because they were necessarily harmful to providers. Instead, the judge ruled that CMS had not followed proper notice issuance and rulemaking. In other words, CMS could decide to increase the fee again and impose the same batching definition, but this time, make sure it does so through proper rulemaking.
And that just might be an avenue CMS could take, since there is a regulation on the NSA IDR process in its final stages right now. In fact, at the time of this latest Court decision, the regulation was being reviewed by the White House.
In the meantime, last week another district court found in favor of CMS and the government with regard to the No Surprises Act: the court rejected the Association of Air Medical Services (AAMS) claim that the NSA’s methodology for calculating the qualifying payment amount (QPA) violated regulatory procedures.
Which brings us back to our roller-coaster analogy on NSA policy: wins and losses in lawsuits, one after the other; opening, closing, then opening again the IDR process; and CMS going back to the drawing board with a regulation in the works.
Hold on tight, y’all!
If you are just crawling out from under a rock, note that last week, we had an election in this country. Republicans won the White
Back in August, you may have heard my colleague Cate Brantley review the latest in a string of lawsuits over the legitimacy of the No
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.
Optimize your outpatient clinical documentation and gain comprehensive knowledge from foundational practices to advanced technologies, ensuring improved patient care and organizational and financial success. This webcast bundle provides a holistic approach to outpatient CDI, empowering you to implement best practices from the ground up and leverage advanced strategies for superior results. You will gain actionable insights to improve documentation quality, patient care, compliance, and financial outcomes.
Enhancing outpatient clinical documentation is crucial for maintaining accuracy, compliance, and proper reimbursement in today’s complex healthcare environment. This webcast, presented by industry expert Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, will provide you with actionable strategies to tackle complex challenges in outpatient documentation. You’ll learn how to craft detailed clinical narratives, utilize advanced EHR features, and implement accurate risk adjustment and HCC coding. The session also covers essential regulatory updates to keep your documentation practices compliant. Join us to gain the tools you need to improve documentation quality, support better patient care, and ensure financial integrity.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Healthcare organizations face complex regulatory requirements under the No Surprises Act and Price Transparency rules. These policies mandate extensive fee disclosures across settings, and confusion is widespread—many hospitals remain unaware they must post every contracted rate. Non-compliance could lead to costly penalties, financial loss, and legal risks. Join David M. Glaser Esq. as he shows you how to navigate these regulations effectively.
Protect your facility from unwanted audits! Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, and take a deep dive into both the CMS and AMA guidelines for reporting post operative pain blocks. You’ll learn how to determine if the nerve block is separately codable with real life examples for better understanding. Becky will also cover how to evaluate whether documentation supports medical necessity, offer recommendations for stronger documentation practices, and provide guidance on educating providers about documentation requirements. She’ll include a discussion of appropriate modifier and diagnosis coding assignment so that you can be confident that your billing of post operative pain blocks is fully supported and compliant.
During this RACmonitor webcast Dr. Ronald Hirsch spotlights the areas of the OIG’s Work Plan and the findings of their most recent audits that impact utilization review, case management, and audit staff. He also provides his common-sense interpretation of the prevailing regulations related to those target issues. You’ll walk away better equipped with strategies to put in place immediately to reduce your risk of paybacks, increased scrutiny, and criminal penalties.
Copyright © 2024 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
